On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:37:49PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> * glphvgacs <darwinsker...@gmail.com> [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> > and this to hooks:
> > folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> > set autoedit=yes
> > my_hdr To:'
> > folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> > my_hdr To:mutt-users@mutt.org'
>
> By the way, you may want to check your hooks thoroughly, as a second
> address seems to have crept into your response. The second address
> includes a trailing single quote ('). The "To:" header I received from
> you via the mailing list is below.
> #v+
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org, mutt-users@mutt.org'
> #v-
>
appended address, i think, has to do with the order of folder's in my
sidebar.
so this is a snippet of my config:
"drw [ --> ]" "notmuch://?query=folder:drw AND tag:unread NOT
from:darwinsker...@gmail.com" \
" [ <-- ]"
"notmuch://?query=from:darwinsker...@gmail.com&limit=512" \
" [ <--> ]" "notmuch://?query=folder:drw AND
from:darwinsker...@gmail.com AND to:darwinsker...@gmail.com" \
" [ .. ]" "notmuch://?query=folder:drw" \
"list [ ycm ]" "notmuch://?query=tag:ycm-users" \
" [ vim ]" "notmuch://?query=tag:vim_use" \
" [ zsh ]" "notmuch://?query=tag:zsh-users" \
" [ mutt ]" "notmuch://?query=to:mutt-users@mutt.org" \
'folder:' is for filesystem directories here; in particular there is path:
.maildir/gmail/drw
if i go to this very thread in [ <-- ], _after_ i've gone over [ ycm ] and
do <list-reply> from there guess what happens:
folder-hook tag:ycm-users "set autoedit=yes; my_hdr
To:ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
and so i get:
To: mutt-users@mutt.org, ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
i don't know if there is a way to un-hook a hook when one leaves a folder,
or rather when a pattern for a hook stops to evaluate TRUE.
another guess, this might have something to do with the fact that
there is no List-id: in mutt-users's headers (wonder why?)
> This may or may not be related to the trailing space I noticed in your
> hooks (the trailing space i on the first line of the second folder-hook
> in the quoted content above).
>
> Regards,
> --
> dave [ please don't CC me ]
(') has to do with me not ever knowing how to wrap a *-hook line. brackets
would be nice; something like:
foo-hook (pattern) {
set bar = baz
}
shouldn't harm anyone and help with clarity, imho. (hmm, i will check the
man after i send this, it might be implemented and then i'm in trouble:) )
