I may not understand what you mean so this may not be a useful suggestion. If I am understanding you, would a useful fix be to extend the recurrence to a longer pattern, and then change the lead time so that there is a much wider range before the task becomes "due"?
Let's say some recurring task is on your list like "check departmental mail slot" which you ought to do every 1-3 days but if you only do it once a week that's fine. Could you not have the recurrence set to a week with a 6 day lead time to allow you a lot of flexibility, yet still have a date by which you really should get it done or you're entering a danger zone of it not really recurring frequently enough to be useful? Just a thought. On 28 April 2011 16:43, Neal <[email protected]> wrote: > Another feature request I would like to make deals with recurrences. I > would like the recurrences to NOT have to have a due date associated with > them. I would like to be able to only have due dates for things that > actually have a due date. Recurrences have an artificial due date to them > and that messes with any filter sorting on due dates. > > And artificial due dates is something that task methodologies like GTD > advocate against. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MyLifeOrganized" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
