Hey Mary, Thanks for the reply. My issue with recurrences is the fact that they are required to have a due date. So the importance of a recurrence is automatically higher because it has a due date then something that doesn't. It really shouldn't. There are two reasons for this"
I don't want the recurrence to be more important then tasks without a due date in something like computed score.. Also, I don't want the recurrence or its subtasks to show up in my "due date" view. They are not real due dates. GTD and a number of other task methodologies discourages against artificially creating due dates for things that don't really need them. MLO recurrences are an example of things that shouldn't by default have a due date. They should only have a due date if they really need one. Mary your work around could possibly handle tasks in the "due date" view. But creating due dates for recurrences longer then my 31 day view makes my head "asplode"... And it really doesn't deal with the sorting issue, though. A due date of next year will show up with a higher priority then a task without a due date. So workarounds for recurrence due dates won't be 100% successful... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
