LORight, I've done that too. MLO is very lightweight and very powerful IMO.
Joel On Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:54:00 AM UTC-4, robisme wrote: > > I must admit that whenever I try another program, I quickly come back to > MLO, which is incomparably more ergonomic and powerful than any other. > > > Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 09:36:55 UTC+2, CTenorman a écrit : >> >> I'm not sure that's the case. I mean, when I compare the functionality >> and usefulness of MLO vs everything else on iOS, Android, Windows, etc., >> I'm continually blown away by what Andrey's done. If anyone can do it, I >> suspect he can. >> >> However, if it is turning out to be more than he'd anticipated, then I'll >> at least put in my hat and say I'd be happy with a few extra features >> tagged on to MLO 3.x. I'd always love more of course (those sample drawings >> a while back looked quite interesting), but what's there is already so >> fantastic that enhancing that would keep at least this customer quite >> happy. It may not look stunningly gorgeous, but my gosh is it powerful! >> >> >> On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 18:02:01 UTC-4, Holmes245 wrote: >>> >>> *Correction:* "Not in the works. I know it's in the works. I meant to >>> say I was just curious if anyone could confirm, who's beta testing it, that >>> it's coming along and possibly getting close to completion. Andrey's been >>> talking about development at least since 7/2011 I know (I asked him about >>> it in a post at that time). That's a bit too long IMO which leads me to >>> think he's bitten off more than he can chew. >>> >>> Joel >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:58:45 PM UTC-4, Holmes245 wrote: >>>> >>>> Is anyone a part of the beta at all? I know a post went out for beta >>>> testers but has anyone actually started beta testing it that can confirm >>>> that it's in the works? This also makes me question exactly how big >>>> Andrey's team is. I'm sure it's a small development team but it's the >>>> non-communication that gets me. I continually see updates for my Android >>>> device but nothing regarding MLO v.4. If that continues in the next month >>>> or so, I'm going to be looking for another solution as well. >>>> >>>> Joel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 8:44:05 AM UTC-4, pottster wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The fact that this thread has had 168 views (and counting) and is the >>>>> most viewed non-pinned thread since the group was formed suggests there >>>>> is >>>>> a lot of expectation out there. Whilst there is, quite rightly, a lot of >>>>> goodwill and respect for Andrey, it's not a static marketplace and it >>>>> would >>>>> be a tragedy if people started looking elsewhere for solutions for the >>>>> want >>>>> of a short update. As England fans have been saying since they went out >>>>> of >>>>> the Euros 2012, the disappointment I can live with it's the hope that >>>>> kills >>>>> me. >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 10:45:21 UTC+1, robisme wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been over 7 months that this version was announced, creating a >>>>>> lot of expectation on the part of customers we all are. >>>>>> It's REALLY time to communicate at least some major features they are >>>>>> working on. >>>>>> That way, I could continue using MLO knowing that the next version >>>>>> will allow me some features I need, instead of looking for another tool >>>>>> that already has this features ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeudi 21 juin 2012 15:48:38 UTC+2, Dwight Arthur a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A small software shop like MLO has to face, daily, the fact that >>>>>>> there are many important and worthwhile things that will not get done >>>>>>> because resources are needed elsewhere. A huge shop can hire a >>>>>>> marketing >>>>>>> team to orchestrate and execute a series of briefings, leaks, and >>>>>>> disclosures that keep everyone excited and engaged until the product >>>>>>> finally reaches market. If MLO were to devote someone to that, it would >>>>>>> probably involve some reduced effort going into preparing the next >>>>>>> version, >>>>>>> which would either come out later, or with fewer features. I think I >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> like MLO to spend a little more time on disclosing product roadmaps and >>>>>>> schedules, but Andrey makes that choice and I will trust him to get it >>>>>>> right. If MLO becomes like Blackberry and just abandons its customers, >>>>>>> I’ll >>>>>>> move on, but I don’t see that happening. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:54:00 AM UTC-4, robisme wrote: > > I must admit that whenever I try another program, I quickly come back to > MLO, which is incomparably more ergonomic and powerful than any other. > > > Le jeudi 28 juin 2012 09:36:55 UTC+2, CTenorman a écrit : >> >> I'm not sure that's the case. I mean, when I compare the functionality >> and usefulness of MLO vs everything else on iOS, Android, Windows, etc., >> I'm continually blown away by what Andrey's done. If anyone can do it, I >> suspect he can. >> >> However, if it is turning out to be more than he'd anticipated, then I'll >> at least put in my hat and say I'd be happy with a few extra features >> tagged on to MLO 3.x. I'd always love more of course (those sample drawings >> a while back looked quite interesting), but what's there is already so >> fantastic that enhancing that would keep at least this customer quite >> happy. It may not look stunningly gorgeous, but my gosh is it powerful! >> >> >> On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 18:02:01 UTC-4, Holmes245 wrote: >>> >>> *Correction:* "Not in the works. I know it's in the works. I meant to >>> say I was just curious if anyone could confirm, who's beta testing it, that >>> it's coming along and possibly getting close to completion. Andrey's been >>> talking about development at least since 7/2011 I know (I asked him about >>> it in a post at that time). That's a bit too long IMO which leads me to >>> think he's bitten off more than he can chew. >>> >>> Joel >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:58:45 PM UTC-4, Holmes245 wrote: >>>> >>>> Is anyone a part of the beta at all? I know a post went out for beta >>>> testers but has anyone actually started beta testing it that can confirm >>>> that it's in the works? This also makes me question exactly how big >>>> Andrey's team is. I'm sure it's a small development team but it's the >>>> non-communication that gets me. I continually see updates for my Android >>>> device but nothing regarding MLO v.4. If that continues in the next month >>>> or so, I'm going to be looking for another solution as well. >>>> >>>> Joel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 27, 2012 8:44:05 AM UTC-4, pottster wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The fact that this thread has had 168 views (and counting) and is the >>>>> most viewed non-pinned thread since the group was formed suggests there >>>>> is >>>>> a lot of expectation out there. Whilst there is, quite rightly, a lot of >>>>> goodwill and respect for Andrey, it's not a static marketplace and it >>>>> would >>>>> be a tragedy if people started looking elsewhere for solutions for the >>>>> want >>>>> of a short update. As England fans have been saying since they went out >>>>> of >>>>> the Euros 2012, the disappointment I can live with it's the hope that >>>>> kills >>>>> me. >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, 27 June 2012 10:45:21 UTC+1, robisme wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It's been over 7 months that this version was announced, creating a >>>>>> lot of expectation on the part of customers we all are. >>>>>> It's REALLY time to communicate at least some major features they are >>>>>> working on. >>>>>> That way, I could continue using MLO knowing that the next version >>>>>> will allow me some features I need, instead of looking for another tool >>>>>> that already has this features ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le jeudi 21 juin 2012 15:48:38 UTC+2, Dwight Arthur a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A small software shop like MLO has to face, daily, the fact that >>>>>>> there are many important and worthwhile things that will not get done >>>>>>> because resources are needed elsewhere. A huge shop can hire a >>>>>>> marketing >>>>>>> team to orchestrate and execute a series of briefings, leaks, and >>>>>>> disclosures that keep everyone excited and engaged until the product >>>>>>> finally reaches market. If MLO were to devote someone to that, it would >>>>>>> probably involve some reduced effort going into preparing the next >>>>>>> version, >>>>>>> which would either come out later, or with fewer features. I think I >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> like MLO to spend a little more time on disclosing product roadmaps and >>>>>>> schedules, but Andrey makes that choice and I will trust him to get it >>>>>>> right. If MLO becomes like Blackberry and just abandons its customers, >>>>>>> I’ll >>>>>>> move on, but I don’t see that happening. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/PZ23dYPBGd8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
