Ok, I didn't understood you were talking about a continuous "E-T" ! 
 (rather a one-time activation)


Le mercredi 7 novembre 2012 07:17:38 UTC+1, Joshua Cearley a écrit :
>
> On Tuesday, November 6, 2012 3:30:51 PM UTC-6, robisme wrote:
>
>> Would a "phone home" activation system bother you that much ? What's the 
>> point problem ?
>>
>
> It's generally a dealbreaker for me.  For me its a rights issue; I don't 
> recognize that a publisher has the privilege to nanny my computer.  I give 
> them money, they give me product, and that's the end of our contact (I 
> rarely talk to tech support.)  They can EULA all they want, which may not 
> even be a binding contract in one's place of residence, but I don't 
> recognize it.
>
> As Dwight says there are issues with hardware failures and unforgiving 
> systems; I've had mac hardware fail and required going through Apple to 
> deauthorize all devices (most DRM users don't actually provide this option 
> to you; MathStudio for instance gives you 5 installs per purchase and 
> officially says that if you need more for any reason, you have to pay up.) 
> I've had Windows instances get unusable (I do a lot of development, and 
> software testing, so things get clogged down pretty bad) even to the point 
> Windows wouldn't allow a reinstall without talking to support (while if I 
> were to have pirated XP instead of using a legal copy, was a simple 
> two-click bypass...) Plus periods of time where ISPs suffer failures 
> (Steam's "always on" policy made problems here; and no, "offline mode" 
> doesn't work 100%.  That has a 2-week expiry and has to be activated prior 
> to losing connection, must have a remembered password (less secure), or 
> else it glitches up), and with the new "six-strikes" mess where ISPs are 
> planning to punish people with disconnections for *allegations* that *
> someone* might have done *something* using your connection (and its 
> considered your fault even if it was a script kiddy sitting on the other 
> side of town with a mounted dish scraping your wi-fi; which is a very 
> possible means of hijacking internet connections.)
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/cMU9ElMBI_EJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.

Reply via email to