J Do I want Andrey spending time on an OS that has about 2% of the market? Answer: no.
No more needs to be said. From: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com [mailto:mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of daniel sekera Sent: 15 November 2012 1:28 PM To: mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [MLO] Currently I see no future in MLO I guess linux would be in the "other" data line on the graph on this website? http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-ww-monthly-201110-201210 On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:55 PM, bs27975 <bs27...@gmail.com> wrote: POPPYCOCK!!! Linux has been around a LONG time to not find an MLO version for it, which has also been around for enough years. What the heck do you think Android is! Points are well taken that a web interface at least bridges in the mean time. Even better, java (yes, ick, but better than nothing), and be done with it all. It is chicken and egg to say Linux is a 'lesser' market when there is no version to even find out if a market exists. +1 for linux, already, for Pete's sake. (Whomever Pete is.) On Wednesday, 7 November 2012 17:51:21 UTC-5, Richard C wrote: Yup - agree. Absolutely no point in supporting platforms that have a tiny fraction of the market. And in terms of my situation, I can't see where I would use a web based interface as I am either working at my computer or I have my Smartphone with me. I think Andrey obviously needs to keep an eye on the market and where a platform is taking off in volume, then it probably makes sense to support that but no point in spending valuable developer effort on platforms where either the market is small; or there is no business case. From: mylifeo...@googlegroups.com [mailto:mylifeo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Trish Putnam Sent: 06 November 2012 10:06 PM To: mylifeo...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [MLO] Currently I see no future in MLO Valid point, Michael, and I agree that the development effort doesn't need to support all of the possible systems out there directly. However, go back to Darius's point that there's no web interface. It's not ideal, but it would alleviate the pain if there were SOME way to make use of MLO from devices that aren't currently supported, such as a way to access your cloud-living data via a web-based UI. At this point, if your device isn't supported you don't have an option to work around it. A web-based UI for MLO cloud would certainly provide at least basic crossplatform support for any internet-connected device, which would be a decent ROI for a single development effort vs. trying to guess which platforms should be supported quickly. On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Michael Emerald, CFA <westpo...@yahoo.com> wrote: The "other side" (me) says that of all the PIM managers I've used, this one is foolproof, useful, rock solid, and increases productivity enormously. I sense that the product will evolve with your own needs below over time. Then again, as a business consultant I'd ask whether catering to the lesser-used systems is a worthwhile investment of programming resources. The history of the product amply demonstrates that the product isn't going to evolve - there is no demonstrable development interest shown in not being Windows centric. From: mylifeo...@googlegroups.com [mailto:mylifeo...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Darius Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 04:44 To: mylifeo...@googlegroups.com Subject: [MLO] Currently I see no future in MLO I've checked a MLO roadmap and I must say I don't see a good future for MLO . MLO is doing a big mistake: no web app or API for MLO cloud, there is even no basic support for web planned . Now MLO is just not a true multi OS device. I've have 3 new machines and on every of them I cannot use MLO. One is Raspberry PI, one is laptop with Ubuntu, one is VMware with Lubuntu for my TV ( I have Windows PC and Galaxy note which I am using fine with MLO) . I know, this is Linux and Linux is not supported, but the problem is bigger: Now we have Windows RT released. How to use MLO? . . . (Reminder: Please remember to trim your posts.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mylifeorganized/-/NeVvtfKKdqcJ. To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <mailto:mylifeorganized%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To post to this group, send email to mylifeorganized@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mylifeorganized+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized?hl=en.
