Thanks Dwight. I can understand the second point about the resources (I 
guess you're saying that mlo would have to be continually syncing and your 
servers can't cope). This could be addressed by introducing another level 
of service to generate the income required to upgrade.

I'm not sure about first point:  " It would have to be done quickly enough 
to arrive at each platform faster than it would take the user to arrive and 
start updating the other platform." I only ever use MLO on one device at a 
time. I  may move from from PC to my laptop to my phone quite quickly but 
certainly not instantly. If we could have mlo check for changes when it has 
been inactive for a while then that would do. I.e. I make a change on my 
laptop and then immediately start using mlo on the phone ; mlo on the phone 
will have been inactive and will therefore auomtatically sync when it has 
focus. 

On Saturday, 14 June 2014 02:29:23 UTC+1, Dwight Arthur wrote:
>
> Instant synch would be ideal, but there’s actually a little more to it. 
> Whenever a changed record gets synched to the cloud there would need to be 
> a way to push the changed record out to every platform that stores a copy 
> of the record. It would have to be done quickly enough to arrive at each 
> platform faster than it would take the user to arrive and start updating 
> the other platform.
>
>  
>
> Regarding why this is not the case already, this takes a lot more 
> resources. It would take bigger servers and faster internet connections, in 
> other words money. In addition any user running MLO on a system where it 
> feels a little sluggish would see a clearly perceptible slowdown when this 
> is implemented, and may have to upgrade to a bigger or faster phone.
>
> _Dwight
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto:
> [email protected] <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *Steve Gledhill
> *Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2014 8:19 PM
> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:>
> *Subject:* Re: [MLO] Use both sync methods simultaneously?
>
>  
>
> I agree with Dwight: we need to find a way to solve this fundamental 
> problem.
>
>  
>
> My preferred method would be option 2: sync each record to the cloud 
> immediately. I don't know why this isn't the case already.
>
> On Thursday, 12 June 2014 15:42:13 UTC+1, Dwight Arthur wrote:
>
> Lucas, I agree with you and it really is an MLO problem.  It's just that 
> it's not a problem with mixed-mode sync.  You can get the same problem with 
> cloud sync alone. Just change a task on windows and sync to cloud, then 
> without syncing Android make a change there. Then sync. One of the changes 
> will be lost based on your sync setting, and neither setting will always be 
> right. Latest change isnt always right either. 
>
> I believe there are two possible solutions:
> 1. Implement on Android the process that's on Windows that notifies the 
> user that a task was modified on both sides and let the user pick which one 
> to keep,  or
> 2. On both Windows and Android, sync each record to the cloud immediately 
> when it is modified.
> -Dwight
> -Dwight
> Mlo betazoid on Android sgn2
>
> On Jun 11, 2014, Lucas D <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On further thought, I now realize it was somewhat unfair for me to blame 
> MLO for this problem, since in a way the behavior makes sense in terms of 
> the logic of the "Use local version" setting. But it's not ideal. So I 
> guess what's really needed is an option under "Both sides changed item" 
> that says "Use most recent version". That would solve the problem.
>
>  
>
> Lucas
>
>  
>
> On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 5:07:02 PM UTC-5, Lucas D wrote:
>
> There is indeed an issue! I have discovered the following scenario that 
> leads to changes being lost:
>
>  
>
> 1. On desktop, create task "Task Version 1".
>
> 2. On android, run wifi sync.
>
> 3. On desktop, edit "Task Version 1" so that it now reads "Task Version 2"
>
> 4. On desktop, run MLO online sync. 
>
> 5. On android, run MLO online sync. 
>
> 6. On desktop, again run MLO online sync. "Task Version 2" has now 
> reverted to "Task Version 1"! I don't think this should be happening and I 
> lost a bunch of work this way!
>
>  
>
> Notes: On android, for the "Both sides changed item" option, I have 
> selected, "Use local version". On desktop, in the MLO synchronization 
> options, I have selected the recommended bidirectional sync option.
>
>  
>
> (Should I be reporting this to support via some other channel?)
>
>  
>
> Best,
>
>  
>
> Lucas
>
>
> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 3:28:50 AM UTC-5, Alexandra MLO Support wrote:
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> You can use Cloud and WiFi sync methods with no issues. 
>
>  
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Lucas D <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> First, a word of thanks to the developers. This software is extremely 
> useful.
>
>  
>
> Now, I'm currently using wifi sync between the desktop and my Android 
> device, and so far everything is working beautifully. This system is good 
> for me because I often have to work in places that have no internet, so the 
> wifi sync is key. On the desktop, my data is stored in Dropbox, so that way 
> I also have a cloud backup. However, during long periods of Android-only 
> use, I become concerned that I have no updated cloud backup, so I am 
> considering adding MLO Cloud sync to the mix. So, my questions are: Can 
> both sync methods (wifi and MLO Cloud) be combined on my Android device? 
> And if they can, are there any issues to be aware of?
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/ef4fd715-57af-4391-8e7b-4df656b2da9d%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/ef4fd715-57af-4391-8e7b-4df656b2da9d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Best Regards,
>
> Alexandra Borovytskaya 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/0dbb006c-25ec-4f52-9708-9db3887dc22f%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/0dbb006c-25ec-4f52-9708-9db3887dc22f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/9a90ec81-237d-492c-aece-d21f84381e61%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to