Hi, Andrew. I am not 100% sure, but I'm guessing that you have fallen into the trap involving active status and future start dates. This has been discussed at length in this forum over the last decade and you can probably find the discussions by searching the forum.

Let me ask you one more question: is it possible that in every single case where an inactive task appears as an unwelcome entry in your view the task's reason for being inactive is that it has a future start date? If not, then something else is wrong, please let me know more about it.

If I have correctly guessed the issue, then here is how you fix it: Wherever you have coded (ActiveAction) replace it with ((ActiveAction) AND ((StartDateTime orOrBefore Now) OR (StartDateTime doesNotExist)))


ActiveAction ignores the start date in order to enable views like "active next seven days"


On 5/21/2016 5:06 PM, Andrew Hwang wrote:
Can somebody please help with why my filter rules are not working properly? I've attached the *.ml file above. Thank you!

On Sunday, April 24, 2016 at 3:41:35 PM UTC-7, Andrew Hwang wrote:

    Thank you Bon!

    Actually, my advanced filter is successful in accomplishing the
    aim of decluttering my list.  (The reason I did not opt for a
    simple grouping to accomplish it is because I'm already grouping
    my to-do list by flags denoting mental energy and time
    available--normal / "braindead" / "pocketwork."  So adding a
    second layer of grouping makes the view extremely cluttered.
     Because then you end up with 3 * n groups, where n = number of
    "Top Level Parents" in your example.  So even if n is a small
    number, you end up with a *lot* of groups.  With my advanced
    filter, I only have 3 groups, but there is no clutter from errands
    lists / groceries lists / etc.)

    My problem was that my advanced filter is NOT successful in
    filtering out inactive tasks.  And I can't understand why--my
    filter rules seem to be properly set up to filter out inactive tasks.

    On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 2:53:05 PM UTC-7, BOC wrote:

        Would simple grouping give you what you need?  Have the groups
        collapsed by default then when you want to go to another
        level, expand the group.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/774734e8-7931-4bed-98e8-d1da4e8631f6%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/774734e8-7931-4bed-98e8-d1da4e8631f6%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mylifeorganized.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/3095b118-2abb-4d32-caa9-4c9ed4fcf94a%40dwightarthur.us.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to