I like that idea.  I have been trying the mark my top two tasks with the 
Weekly Goal and then using the Kanban view I just created for the past 
couple of days.  I like the stars idea for today and only reviewing this 
list with a weekly or monthly goal.  That would allow me to do a quick 
review separate from the review everything list.  I don't use my inbox like 
I should.  Since I sit at a desk most of the day and always have the 
desktop version open I usually just put stuff where it goes when I enter 
it.  

I kind of liked the post on emailing amazon orders to the inbox too.  Right 
now I track purchases which is usually 5-10 per day with a separate task 
entry in my followup folder.  It would be nice to just cc my inbox when I 
send to our bookkeeper since I am already sending the email anyway and 
having the tracking info right there.  I will play with that too.  That 
email is created quickly with text expander so I can change the text 
expander generated subject line to make it go right into my purchases 
folder I believe and have all the info I want in the task name.
Susannah



On Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 9:10:31 AM UTC-4, struesda wrote:
>
> To help focus my lists down to more manageable chunks, when I am 
> disciplined about it, during my weekly reviews I will tag some of the tasks 
> as weekly or monthly goals.  Then each day(ish) I will look at just those 
> weekly or monthly goals, and star just the top 2 or 3 tasks for the next 
> day - anything that is due that day - and what else would I like to get 
> done to call it an OK day?  Then I pretty much only work off the starred 
> list and dump anything new into the inbox.  If it is truly urgent - the new 
> inbox stuff will get a star too.  
>
> During the day - I don't let myself look into my other lists.  That way I 
> don't get so overwhelmed.  I just have a focused starred list.
>
> If for some miraculous reason I clear all my starred tasks - then I can go 
> back to my weekly/monthly goals and add 2-3 more stars.
>
> My problem is that I don't regularly do those weekly reviews, so sometimes 
> the other lists start to get behind and I have put in a longer review 
> session to get them back into shape.     
>
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 4:33:32 PM UTC-4, Susannah wrote:
>>
>> I have little trouble with dependencies in a specific project.  The issue 
>> I do have with them is if I would like to do this project before I do that 
>> one.  If something gets stuck that I didn't foresee in the first project I 
>> lose sight of the other one that I could be working on while I wait on 
>> someone or something.  I am learning that is not a good thing to do at 
>> least until I can get regular reviews under control.  It does work well 
>> though if an emergency pops up I can put that in and make everything 
>> dependent on the emergency which shortens my list very quickly until the 
>> emergency is done that is.  Or if I could get my list short enough to have 
>> one active folder for work and one for personal instead of how it is 
>> below.  I am a long way off from that though.
>>
>> I saw something on that twitter link that I think is going to really 
>> help.  Putting a closed time frame on certain contexts.  That will help 
>> separate a lot of my home tasks from my tasks that can be done anytime and 
>> anywhere.
>>
>> My structured list is set up pretty similar to yours: 
>> Routines - reoccurring tasks anything from daily to yearly
>>    System - general system maintenance like clearing my inboxes and 
>> weekly reviews etc
>>    Work
>>       Role 1
>>           Active
>>           Prioritized (hidden - someday maybe plus anything that doesn't 
>> have to be done this week) - I used to have these separate but it was too 
>> hard to review so I try to prioritize so the top is things that need to be 
>> done sooner and the bottom is maybe never things
>>       Role 2
>>           Active
>>           Prioritized
>>      ...all the way to Role 9
>>    Personal
>>       Role 1
>>           Active
>>           Prioritized
>>      ...all the way to Role 8
>> One Times - projects that completed and go away
>>    System - ex would be applying those closed periods to my contexts
>>    Work
>>       Role 1
>>           Active
>>           Prioritized (hidden - someday maybe plus anything that doesn't 
>> have to be done this week) - I used to have these separate but it was too 
>> hard to review so I try to prioritize so the top is things that need to be 
>> done sooner and the bottom is maybe never things
>>       Role 2
>>           Active
>>           Prioritized
>>      ...all the way to Role 9
>>    Personal
>>       Role 1
>>           Active
>>           Prioritized
>>      ...all the way to Role 8
>>
>> Then I have a few other main levels like procedures to copy, ideas, 
>> reference, and I actually do have a probably never at the bottom of 
>> projects that got x'd but their plan was very detailed and I didn't want to 
>> just delete b/c it could be used in different projects (all of these are 
>> hidden).  For example I manage our network at work among other things so I 
>> have a procedure for setting up a new employee in my procedures to copy 
>> folder.  So when we have a new employee I go copy the whole project from 
>> procedures to copy and paste it in my Network Role under work and give it 
>> the deadline of the day before the employee starts.  Just that one project 
>> may have 50 tasks with a lot of dependencies especially if it includes 
>> setting up a new computer from scratch.
>>
>> Another big issue I have is I don't know what is coming.  I wish I had 
>> away to see down the road easily.  For example b/c my routines are set to 
>> weekly, every 6 mos, annually etc sometimes they fall on the same day.  
>> That isn't a good list day even though it may be a productive day.  Other 
>> times I had several things dependent on one project so when that project 
>> gets done all of these other things immediately show up on my next action 
>> list and it gets kind of overwhelming.
>>
>> I think my system itself works pretty well if it has a doable number of 
>> tasks but I don't have anything that stops me from over planning the time 
>> available.  Does that make sense?  Does anyone have a way to see when you 
>> are over allocated?
>> Thanks,
>> Susannah
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 2:01:43 PM UTC-4, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes agree 100% on Someday/Maybe as context (which can then be hidden).
>>>
>>> Another key thing that helps me is making sure task dependencies are 
>>> properly set. I often use subtasks and frequently use the 'subtasks must be 
>>> completed in order' as it helps a LOT with clutter from a project.
>>>
>>> Just for reference, I have a structured list with 4 main categories:
>>> [work]
>>> [career]
>>> [home]
>>> [personal]
>>> inbox
>>>
>>> Then different things under each ([home]-[seasonal]-[summer] for 
>>> recurring summer tasks, for example) where things have subtasks.
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Fernando
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 12:59:20 PM UTC-4 [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd seriously recommend utilizing a "Someday/Maybe" list for some of 
>>>> your tasks. My lists get really long and I started feeling overwhelmed. 
>>>> Using the S/M allowed me to put tasks there that I wasn't going to get too 
>>>> in the next month or 2 and it  kept them out of my views. I have my S/M 
>>>> set 
>>>> to not display in the to-do lists. The key is to regularly review them and 
>>>> pull some back to active and add items that have recently been added to 
>>>> the 
>>>> overall list. Be honest with yourself, if its a "want to do" vs a "have to 
>>>> do" or "should do" then move it to the S/M list and focus on the things 
>>>> you've identified you really want to get done.
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>> Leigh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, July 14, 2020 at 6:37:38 AM UTC-10, Susannah wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't really have anything specific in mind.  My main issue is I 
>>>>> have too many tasks.  So my next action list is too long.  I really need 
>>>>> a 
>>>>> view that I can get better use out of the phone app - mine is pretty much 
>>>>> impossible to use with how I have it set up now.  Actually this Kanban 
>>>>> view 
>>>>> may help with that.   I will check out your twitter link too it looks 
>>>>> like 
>>>>> there are a lot of helpful things on there.
>>>>> I spend way too much time managing my list so anything that makes that 
>>>>> easier would be helpful.  I have tabs for things like tasks without 
>>>>> contexts that I check regularly to make sure I didn't forget to give a 
>>>>> new 
>>>>> tasks a context.  Also have one for overdue tasks so I can quickly look 
>>>>> at 
>>>>> those.
>>>>> I'm not very good about using the contexts as intended b/c my list is 
>>>>> too long again.  Common theme as you can tell.
>>>>> I rarely get through a weekly review b/c it takes so long.  That is 
>>>>> just for active tasks I rarely get to review the next up list - that has 
>>>>> turned more into a black hole.  I do have mini reviews of certain 
>>>>> sections 
>>>>> built into my routines though.  I would love something that would make 
>>>>> reviews go faster so that I can do them more regularly.  
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Susannah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 1:17:03 PM UTC-4, Andrei Bacean wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Susannah 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have any other demos. But, i can do some. Let me know which 
>>>>>> view you would like to build.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, please check https://twitter.com/mylifeorg
>>>>>> There are some useful tricks published there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have a good day,
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>
>>>>>> пятница, 10 июля 2020 г. в 14:44:17 UTC+3, Susannah: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for that!  I have been wanting to do that for the longest 
>>>>>>> time and got it set up in 3 minutes with your demo.  Do you have any 
>>>>>>> other 
>>>>>>> demos?  Examples of other views you use often maybe.
>>>>>>> Susannah
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Friday, July 10, 2020 at 5:19:53 AM UTC-4, Andrei Bacean wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>> Sorry for late reply.
>>>>>>>> No, there is no such option.
>>>>>>>> The idea is to use views groups as Kanban categories.
>>>>>>>> Here is a demonstration video.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/s/vri0jxrhjxqtly9/Kanban%20view.mp4?dl=0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have a good day!
>>>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> пятница, 26 июня 2020 г. в 08:59:33 UTC+3, [email protected]: 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you, I'm a little confused. Is there an option to list as 
>>>>>>>>> Kanban? If so, I haven't found it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FM
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 4:57:15 AM UTC-4 Andrei Bacean wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Another workaround is to use a custom view with *grouping* *as 
>>>>>>>>>> Kanban categories *(grouping by context, by flag, by text tag).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, you can use emoji to insert some visual signs to the 
>>>>>>>>>> grouping name like ▶ ⏸ ⏯🔄🔜🔼🔽⬆⬇↗↘🎯🤵 etc.
>>>>>>>>>> To insert an emoji symbol to the context/tag name on windows 10, 
>>>>>>>>>> press "Win" key and "." key simultaneously.
>>>>>>>>>> Emoji symbols on windows are black and white. Instead on android 
>>>>>>>>>> (I guess on iOS too) they are colorful.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>>>>>> Andrei
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> вторник, 23 июня 2020 г., 13:45:00 UTC+3 пользователь Richard 
>>>>>>>>>> Emes написал:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Fernando,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The workaround I'm using is to create sub-projects for each 
>>>>>>>>>>> board; not started, ongoing, waiting and completed. I then move 
>>>>>>>>>>> each task 
>>>>>>>>>>> on each 'board' to the correct sub-project depending on status. I 
>>>>>>>>>>> don't 
>>>>>>>>>>> complete any of the tasks on the Completed 'board'. I also don't 
>>>>>>>>>>> assign 
>>>>>>>>>>> Contexts to any of the tasks so they don't appear in any of my 
>>>>>>>>>>> other task 
>>>>>>>>>>> views. I use the text tags to put a name on each task if someone 
>>>>>>>>>>> else is 
>>>>>>>>>>> working on it and then move it to the Waiting 'board'
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Interested to see if anyone else has any other ideas
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, 19 June 2020 at 21:09:58 UTC+1 [email protected] 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to create a view where the tasks appear on 
>>>>>>>>>>>> different columns as opposed to linearly? This would be a good way 
>>>>>>>>>>>> of 
>>>>>>>>>>>> implementing Kanban boards with MLO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Simple conceptual view below:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A first version could be just supporting viewing tasks like 
>>>>>>>>>>>> this, while a follow-up version would add/remove/change contexts 
>>>>>>>>>>>> based on 
>>>>>>>>>>>> dragging the tasks between the (customizable) columns.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Would LOVE to use MLO for this :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Has anyone done Kanban with MLO? If so, how?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fernando
>>>>>>>>>>>> (MLO user since hmmm.... 2005-ish)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/81fe4637-7c1d-4d9e-bfde-7b4f167409b7o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to