IMHO... adding MCP to the mix would be more harmful than useful. --- MLO works perfectly without any cloud if you use the core stuff only. Moving this to a browser is - IMHO - a very bad idea. The UI for Windows PC is great and enables most sophisticated use cases and scenarios. My take would be as a customer who loves and lives with MLO - do not move away from the core value propositions of MLO for daily handling and usecases. --- what is possible and works fine is exporting MLO-XML and then work with AI on it. That makes sense, but only for insights creation and adding the widsom of AI - which is the collective knowledge of humanity - in a AI-fuzzy way to the mix and use the haluzinations for creativity injection ;). --- currently AI is not able to really "think" or execute precisely stuff - yet. Thats way using it for the core features of MLO would hurt a lot ;).
just my2cents - A. On Wednesday, 14 January 2026 at 18:52:59 UTC+4 Jeff Smith wrote: > If you understand how AI works, you will know it is more hype than > anything else. Good search engine, if you're willing to make sure you learn > everything so that you spot what is not correct that it spit out. In the > end, they focus on hype because it sells and they have spent WAY WAY more > money than they should have (which by the way decreases value of the > dollar).... > I will admit it is quite impressive, the amount of programming and > expensive retraining going into it so there are big results, just not as > useful as the entire public is being told. Modern business is now all about > cash grab before the general public finds out it wasn't going to be worth > it. A decade ago and 10 decades ago they were always pushing excitement > saying "just around the corner". Now that they are saying "we finally made > it around the corner" here we are being told that any moment now we will > have the amazing things in our own hands but I still only hear rumors that > it finally exists... somewhere I have not yet seen for myself. Convince me > by showing me the actual value, not merely showing some specific example > that doesn't relate to what I need AI to do. Not just say "if you give us > more resources it will finally be in your hands." > This thread is a very example of what I'm talking about. One day GPT 3 > started spitting out words that it heard intelligent people say and you > said wow this AI is now intelligent. The worst thing you could have done is > fall all over that Sam guy just because he said, "We don't know how it > works"... This aint the movies so it never was magically intelligent now > from lightning or something that would not cause that. > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 5:06 AM ad-mx <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm pretty sure that mcp and AI integration is necessary nowaydays >> because large volume of generated code also generates need for tasks the >> dev has to perform around that code => having mcp in task app would be >> life-saver, agent just adds them to the inbox or proper project with right >> annotations at the end of its session. MCP is basically API agent >> understands and it works exceptionally well. >> >> Best regards >> AD >> >> środa, 22 października 2025 o 23:06:31 UTC+2 Hammy Havoc napisał(a): >> >>> For anyone reading in future, whilst I'm very much anti-unethical AI in >>> terms of training and ripping off hard-working folks with gen AI, if an MCP >>> or API integration actually worked, I would be interested in seeing how >>> someone runs a local LLM to organise their tasks and make sense of it all >>> from an existing workspace. For this to not be counterproductive, it would >>> need to be Clippy-like suggestions about moving some tasks to certain >>> projects or making them sequential sub-tasks of another. But this would >>> sincerely need to work well (and I don't think a next-word prediction model >>> is going to cut it) or it would be as annoying and mostly useless as >>> Clippy. Would love to be pleasantly surprised, but I don't think it'll >>> materialize as I personally feel LLMs are a dead-end technology for most of >>> the problems they're being thrown at. >>> >>> You could probably do it without an LLM just by using RegEx for keywords >>> and looking at dates and times when tasks were created, or looking at the >>> archive of tasks that are already complete, looking for patterns in when >>> they're created, what order they're completed in, context etc. >>> >>> The API excites me quite a bit. >>> >>> On Wednesday, 16 July 2025 at 17:30:45 UTC imajeff wrote: >>> >>>> Now, I'm in no way speaking for the MLO team. I have nothing against >>>> anyone trying to make good use of modern AI, I've been studying AI since >>>> the 80's and it's only that I understand the problems apparently better >>>> than those who said basically *we developed it but we don't know how >>>> it works*. >>>> >>>> MLO team is doing it of course. You should look for the recent >>>> conversation on https://groups.google.com/g/mylifeorganized/ >>>> where they have already responding to the question and said they are >>>> working on the Web version of MyLifeOrganized, it was already announced >>>> that will have a good API, but they said that will be the API to support >>>> AI >>>> integration. >>>> Fingers crossed, we'll see how it goes >>>> >>> > -- > "It is not what I believe that will make-or-break; It is what I'm doing > about it." --Jefferson Smith > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MyLifeOrganized" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/4f9224a4-9dce-488d-9a2c-8a4786925915n%40googlegroups.com.
