Is MCP happening?  I'd very much like to have AI assistant manage my MLO 
tasks.
Open Claw and/or Claude assistant with MCP connections.

I'm just getting into Shortwave too.
Just having Claude be able to review emails, notes in notion, then send a 
message to team in Slack is huge.  Being able CRUD to MLO would be a very 
big win for that ecosystem 

On Friday, January 16, 2026 at 9:07:40 PM UTC-5 Daniel Clark wrote:

> Re: AI, another data point is that the https://goblin.tools/ app is like 
> #4 in paid productivity Android apps. It uses AI to break down tasks into 
> small steps automatically. 
>
> On Fri Jan 16, 2026, 08:15 PM GMT, Joel wrote:
>
> Completely support this idea.  AI integration is long overdue. The human 
> mind is not designed to be burdened with the mundane.  My Life Organized is 
> uniquely the best platform for it's implementation.  
> AI is a massive opportunity for GTD implementation improvements.  
>
> On Friday, January 16, 2026 at 11:52:45 AM UTC-4 Daniel Clark wrote:
>
>> The Shortwave email client is AI and is super useful. I've never been 
>> able to do Inbox Zero before, but now I can. It is very good at creating 
>> todo items and calendar events from emails, easily referencing numerous 
>> different email threads. Being able to interface it's TODO list with MLO's 
>> would be awesome. Increasingly the value of software is in its ecosystem, 
>> not it as a standalone thing. MCP will open MLO to be part of an entire 
>> ecosystem of AI tools. The AI part isn't even that important, for my use 
>> case at least it would just be a way to maintain sync. This can of course 
>> be done with non-AI code, the difference is that with AI the "glue code" 
>> can be a set of prompts created by a non-programmer user instead of a 
>> developer using an API. 
>>
>> On Fri Jan 16, 2026, 08:31 AM GMT, Alexander W. wrote:
>>
>> IMHO... adding MCP to the mix would be more harmful than useful.
>> ---
>> MLO works perfectly without any cloud if you use the core stuff only.
>> Moving this to a browser is - IMHO - a very bad idea.
>> The UI for Windows PC is great and enables most sophisticated use cases 
>> and scenarios.
>> My take would be as a customer who loves and lives with MLO - do not move 
>> away from the core value propositions of MLO for daily handling and 
>> usecases.
>> ---
>> what is possible and works fine is exporting MLO-XML and then work with 
>> AI on it. That makes sense, but only for insights creation and adding the 
>> widsom of AI - which is the collective knowledge of humanity - in a 
>> AI-fuzzy way to the mix and use the haluzinations for creativity injection 
>> ;).
>> ---
>> currently AI is not able to really "think" or execute precisely stuff - 
>> yet.
>> Thats way using it for the core features of MLO would hurt a lot ;).
>>
>> just my2cents - A.
>>
>> On Wednesday, 14 January 2026 at 18:52:59 UTC+4 Jeff Smith wrote:
>>
>>> If you understand how AI works, you will know it is more hype than 
>>> anything else. Good search engine, if you're willing to make sure you learn 
>>> everything so that you spot what is not correct that it spit out. In the 
>>> end, they focus on hype because it sells and they have spent WAY WAY more 
>>> money than they should have (which by the way decreases value of the 
>>> dollar)....
>>> I will admit it is quite impressive, the amount of programming and 
>>> expensive retraining going into it so there are big results, just not as 
>>> useful as the entire public is being told. Modern business is now all about 
>>> cash grab before the general public finds out it wasn't going to be worth 
>>> it. A decade ago and 10 decades ago they were always pushing excitement 
>>> saying "just around the corner". Now that they are saying "we finally made 
>>> it around the corner" here we are being told that any moment now we will 
>>> have the amazing things in our own hands but I still only hear rumors that 
>>> it finally exists... somewhere I have not yet seen for myself. Convince me 
>>> by showing me the actual value, not merely showing some specific example 
>>> that doesn't relate to what I need AI to do. Not just say "if you give us 
>>> more resources it will finally be in your hands."
>>> This thread is a very example of what I'm talking about. One day GPT 3 
>>> started spitting out words that it heard intelligent people say and you 
>>> said wow this AI is now intelligent. The worst thing you could have done is 
>>> fall all over that Sam guy just because he said, "We don't know how it 
>>> works"... This aint the movies so it never was magically intelligent now 
>>> from lightning or something that would not cause that. 
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 5:06 AM ad-mx <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm pretty sure that mcp and AI integration is necessary nowaydays 
>>>> because large volume of generated code also generates need for tasks the 
>>>> dev has to perform around that code => having mcp in task app would be 
>>>> life-saver, agent just adds them to the inbox or proper project with right 
>>>> annotations at the end of its session. MCP is basically API agent 
>>>> understands and it works exceptionally well.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> AD
>>>>
>>>> środa, 22 października 2025 o 23:06:31 UTC+2 Hammy Havoc napisał(a):
>>>>
>>>>> For anyone reading in future, whilst I'm very much anti-unethical AI 
>>>>> in terms of training and ripping off hard-working folks with gen AI, if 
>>>>> an 
>>>>> MCP or API integration actually worked, I would be interested in seeing 
>>>>> how 
>>>>> someone runs a local LLM to organise their tasks and make sense of it all 
>>>>> from an existing workspace. For this to not be counterproductive, it 
>>>>> would 
>>>>> need to be Clippy-like suggestions about moving some tasks to certain 
>>>>> projects or making them sequential sub-tasks of another. But this would 
>>>>> sincerely need to work well (and I don't think a next-word prediction 
>>>>> model 
>>>>> is going to cut it) or it would be as annoying and mostly useless as 
>>>>> Clippy. Would love to be pleasantly surprised, but I don't think it'll 
>>>>> materialize as I personally feel LLMs are a dead-end technology for most 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> the problems they're being thrown at.
>>>>>
>>>>> You could probably do it without an LLM just by using RegEx for 
>>>>> keywords and looking at dates and times when tasks were created, or 
>>>>> looking 
>>>>> at the archive of tasks that are already complete, looking for patterns 
>>>>> in 
>>>>> when they're created, what order they're completed in, context etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> The API excites me quite a bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, 16 July 2025 at 17:30:45 UTC imajeff wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, I'm in no way speaking for the MLO team. I have nothing against 
>>>>>> anyone trying to make good use of modern AI, I've been studying AI since 
>>>>>> the 80's and it's only that I understand the problems apparently better 
>>>>>> than those who said basically *we developed it but we don't know how 
>>>>>> it works*.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MLO team is doing it of course. You should look for the recent 
>>>>>> conversation on https://groups.google.com/g/mylifeorganized/
>>>>>> where they have already responding to the question and said they are 
>>>>>> working on the Web version of MyLifeOrganized, it was already announced 
>>>>>> that will have a good API, but they said that will be the API to support 
>>>>>> AI 
>>>>>> integration. 
>>>>>> Fingers crossed, we'll see how it goes
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> -- 
>>>  "It is not what I believe that will make-or-break; It is what I'm doing 
>>> about it." --Jefferson Smith
>>>
>> -- 
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/4f9224a4-9dce-488d-9a2c-8a4786925915n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/4f9224a4-9dce-488d-9a2c-8a4786925915n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MyLifeOrganized" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/2cec225d-31b5-4c94-b065-58abb18ac986n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/2cec225d-31b5-4c94-b065-58abb18ac986n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MyLifeOrganized" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mylifeorganized/a649edff-60e3-48ba-b8ee-ee50c6bbad78n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to