On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Warren Young wrote: > Tim Johnson wrote: > >> It isn't "broken," per se. > > > > When you say that it isn't "broken", could you please elaborate? > > Once again: It seems to me that you're seeing a purposeful choice of > configuration. It could very well be that the configuration makes sense > in some one's use. The fact that it breaks for you doesn't mean the > configuration makes no sense. > > I don't know for a fact that this is what's going on. I don't use > Ubuntu. I'm just trying to find an explanation for why it is the way it > is. > > > And thanks in advance, because, from where I'm sitting, time is money > > and I know that it takes time to answers these emails. > > I'm glad you see that, but why then are you continuing to argue back and > forth instead of going to mysql.com and getting a different set of > binaries to try? You could have done that about five times in the time > it's took to have this exchange. Even if it didn't work, we'd be > farther along towards a solution by now.
I am not arguing. I am being cautious. If I were on a slack or redhat system, which I'm more familiar with, I would have reinstalled already. I'm going to refer this to a a debian or ubuntu list and see what responses I get before I do anything further. Thanks for your help. Don't make an argument where none exists :-). tim -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
