All,

I think I may have at least an initial solution.  Cortex-Ax processors are 
the "application processors" that are used in tablets, etc.  I went to the 
ARM site for Coretex-A development boards 
- 
http://www.arm.com/support/university/development-platforms/cortex-a8-development-platforms.php

The first one they mention is the BeagleBone.  It uses an AM3359 
- http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/am3359.pdf - which has a General Purpose 
Memory Controller:
– General-Purpose Memory Controller (GPMC)
• Flexible 8-Bit and 16-Bit Asynchronous Module
Memory Interface with up to Seven Chip – Controls the Entry and Exit of 
Stand-By and
• Uses BCH Code to Support 4-, 8-, or 16-Bit – Responsible for Sleep 
Sequencing, Power
• Uses Hamming Code to Support 1-Bit ECC 

The BeagleBone exposes this GPMC interface - here is an example 
- 
http://engineersofthecorn.blogspot.ca/2012/06/faux-gpmc-interfacing-with-beaglebone.html

So you could EITHER create a "bit-banged" S-100 interface OR use this GPMC 
interface.

http://www.adafruit.com/datasheets/BBB_SRM.pdf

http://www.adafruit.com/products/1876

Andrew

On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:37:52 AM UTC-7, monahanz wrote:
>
> Greg, thank you for the tips.  Your experience is most helpful.   While I 
> will keep looking I would really value any further suggestions you may 
> gather over the weekend. 
> Sound like the ARM9 is the way for us to go.   The two things that are 
> putting me off on the Toradex units,  first they are overseas (but 
> apparently have a distribution center in Seattle) possibly getting units 
> could be difficult, also looking at the specks of the support board -- it 
> appears quite complex.    One basic question,  how different are the 
> various differently named ARM9's  for example they say there's is a "NVIDIA 
> Tegra 3 quad-core Cortex-A9".    Is that one more complex to program than 
> others or are they all the same, 
>
> In the ideal world I would like a mini-board with the following 
> parameters:- 
>
> Easy connector attachment to an S100  board which acts as a support board 
> for the 'chip' 
> Clear documentation of I/O lines 
> At least 30 or so GPIO lines we could use to control the S100 bus when the 
> ARM CPU is in master mode. 
> A windows based IDE interface to program the CPU and download software. 
> The capability of running a Linux system on the "chip". 
> The unit is available in single unit quantities. 
>   
> I never thought of the Auto industry, good idea, thanks 
> Please see if you can slice time to take a look see at candidates this 
> weekend. 
> Thanks 
>
>
> John 
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto:
> [email protected] <javascript:>] On Behalf Of G. Beat 
> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 11:32 PM 
> To: [email protected] <javascript:> 
> Subject: RE: [N8VEM-S100:5041] ARM CPU on the S100Bus-II 
>
> If an ARM processor is desired, then you start with ARM's roadmap. 
> For example, here is the ARM7 web page. 
> Two notable observations: 
> First, main headline on page is about migration, and second is advice to 
> not use for new designs. 
> http://www.arm.com/products/processors/classic/arm7/index.php 
>
> So, we scratch ARM7, since N8VEM users would desire a longer processor 
> life (supported Linux version, etc.) and not immediate extinction. 
>
> That leaves the ARM9 and the ARM11. 
>
> The ARM11 is popular with mobile phones, a range of SoCs and various OEM 
> products. 
> The ARM9 has been most successful, so far, and has replaced the ARM7 for 
> entry designs. 
>
> The "who" takes a bit longer to sort out, and involves more than hardware 
> mfg. 
>
> You may laugh, but one "bell-weather" that I routinely check is the 
> automotive industry, especially last 20 years. 
> The reason is longevity of support for successful implementations. 
>
> Freescale is the old Motorola Texas/Arizona processor/IC/transistor 
> division, and the Motorola auto fabrication/car module engineering & 
> assembly was bought by another company. 
>
> Freescale has an ARM9 series, but I have not looked at it.   
> I do note that Ubuntu (Linux) dropped support at 10.10 for Freescale i.MX 
> (ARM9). 
> That is the wildcard ... OS support and the software development community 
> support (earlier comments along same line). 
>
> Labor Day weekend may permit more time for research. 
>
> greg 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "N8VEM-S100" group. 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"N8VEM-S100" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to