routerOS v7 (2021) supports IPv6 NAT66/NPT A quick search also shows that Vyatta supports NAT66/NPT edgeOS, well its Ubiquiti, what do you expect when trying to use trash?
---------------------------------- Brandon Jackson [email protected] On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 11:29 AM Matthew Petach via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2026, 00:32 Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Am 17.06.26 um 08:29 schrieb Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG: > > > Has any CPE vendor implemented the redundancy NPTv6 scheme (with all > > IPv6 features) that Matthew mentioned for NAT44? > > > > No, as normal CPE devices are used by home users. They don't need that. > > Business users buy professional devices and use BGP or other routing > > protocols for real redundancy. > > > > > *facepalm* > > No, my small business with 15 people doesn't buy Juniper routers with two > BGP upstreams and pay ARIN for an ASN and provider independent IP space. > > But it *does* still want to be able to get work done on the Internet when > ISP A goes down by using ISP B. > > You seem to be denying the existence of all the small businesses in the > world. > Given that Google estimates there are 200 to 400 million enterprises with > less than 50 employees worldwide, that's a pretty big chunk of the > business world to ignore. > > Or are you suggesting that 400 million small businesses should get their > own ASNs and provider independent IPv6 space, and use BGP to gain > redundancy for their businesses? > > (talk about driving a demand for more router RAM for the DFZ core! ;-P ) > > > > > Reminder: 6man WG makes all possible efforts to block NPTv6. > > > > It already exists, IIRC Cisco IOS supports that. > > > > > Too bad every small business using edgeOS or Vyatta or routerOS is left > out--no NPTv6 or NAT66 for them. But that was some pretty good shilling > for Cisco there. ;) > > In all seriousness, I hope we're coming to the realization that there's a > big use case that is not currently well supported on the V6 world, and > telling hundreds of millions of small businesses to add to the BGP-speaking > core routing tables is probably *not* the right answer. Unless of course > you want Geoff Huston to do a NANOG talk entitled "What The Hell Just > Happened?" with a hockey-stick shaped graph showing the number of ASNs in > the v6 routing tables. :/ > > In summary: there are still technical hurdles to deploying IPv6 that we > created through our decisions long ago that need to be solved before we can > start talking about sunsetting IPv4. > > Thanks! > > Matt > > > > > -- > > Gruß > > Marco > > Muell und Spam bitte an [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > > NANOG mailing list > > > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/64HPVUSE2EXJH664UAY3T4YJX2G3VQET/ > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/TXYK36SDIONPF72NKIEY6XHR7DDCBD7G/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/CKUBVOP46YDAYPT4SOWY7BSJ2QCF2MZW/
