On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 at 11:21, andrew--- via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm amazed anyone in this list would consider PAT in IPv6 as a preferred > solution. Available solution in the toolbox. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/KADC66ZRJBI2LGELIG4IQ2YIBIXDTWEK/
