On Sat, Nov 27, 2021, 17:36 Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote:
> Well, 1.4x faster is a bit of an odd metric. I presume that means that > connection set up times measured were on average > 1/1.4 times as long for IPv6 as they were for IPv4, but there are other > possible interpretations. > > So really, that’s a convoluted way of saying it takes 29% less time to set > up an IPv6 connection than an IPv4 connection on average. > > I can believe that is likely in a scenario where one is dealing with IPv4 > NAT overhead. > Why isn't this just inconsistent paths between V6 and V4/nat? (Divergent topologies)