On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > Ipv6 is not important for users, it is important for network operators who > want to sustain their business.
I agree with the first part; not sure I agree with the second part. > Nope. Nobody will leave money on the table by alienating users. I think it may be possible to make money with compelling IPv6-only content/services/applications. > Apple and msft os' s now make a clear judgement on that. So, you need to > update your perspective. I'm not very interested in their judgement. So, I'm quite happy with my perspective, thanks. > Does not matter. And it will not happen. Proof by repeated assertion doesn't sway me. > The better question, for an isp, is what kind of ipv4 secondary market budget > do you have? How hot is your cgn running? Like ALGs much ? Security and > attribute much ? These are important, yes. > Again , users dont care or know about v4 or v6. This is purely a network > operator and app issue (cough cough ... skype). It's my contention that IPv6 won't be widely deployed unless/until end-customers call up their ISPs demanding this 'IPv6 or whatever' thing they need to accomplish some goal they have. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
