And your proposed solution is?

-mel via cell

> On Jun 13, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Dan Hollis <goe...@sasami.anime.net> wrote:
> It's funny to see all this apologia for nanog spammers and attempts to 
> normalize the practice and brush it off as acceptable or unavoidable, 
> especially after the "omg evil politicans voted to rollback fcc privacy rules 
> and let companies sell your data" derpy derp thread.
> You can't have it both ways.
> -Dan

Reply via email to