I agree, though in [2] and [3] I believe that changes (if any) to the core NAnt code should be contributed back.

Scott Hernandez wrote:

All of these scenarios should be allowed, IMHO.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Brant Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing




I think we should ask ourselves what types of uses we would want NAnt to

be


available to. Here are two scenarios.

[1] A commerical company wants to release a custom task and charge money

for


it. Do we want to allow this?

[2] A commerical company wants to distribute a customized version of NAnt

as


part of its software package (ie: A compiler company, IDE developer) and
charge money for the entire package.   Do we want to allow this?

[3] A company creates a large software package that requires it to be
"built" by the end customer.  Are they allowed to distribute NAnt to do
this?  What if they modified NAnt in some way?

brant




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
nant-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers

Reply via email to