> that should be doable. The class would automatically have the > FunctionSet attribute added if definefunctions was true. > > but what if you actually wanted to use the constructor to do somthing ?
Why ? Who'll call the construtor? AFAIR it's the ExpressionEvaluator who does call functions. And there's one-function == one "new" rule in place. > With the longer format it would be easier to copy your function code out > when you get around to making a proper assembly for it. I don't think it's a problem. You either want to implement a function library - then you start with a full *.cs file, compile it and test or want to write an ad-hoc function that's locally needed and is probably never gonna be reused - use <script> task. Simple. Jarek ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
