On Apr 30, 2010, at 09:12, Chris Engel wrote: > > [...] > That would be my deployment scheme if I had to do IPv6 without NAT. Though > frankly, the plans right now are to avoid IPv6 entirely until there is some > NAT solution. Possibly looking at doing some sort of NAT46 gateway solution > if necessary and staying on IPv4 local. > [...] > Right now IPv6 (for Enterprises at least) is just a huge unjustified cost > center...that people who are being pro-active may dabble a little bit with to > build up some experience for the time when their may be a real need to > support it.
Sounds like you have no clear use for NAT66, and you can live indefinitely on IPv4-only. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
