Hi, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 05:41:30PM +0200, Rémi Després wrote: > But, again, many users already use "native" IPv6 (neither 6to4 nor Teredo) > and no bomb has exploded. > And AFAIK no bomb is timed to explode either.
Please understand that *your* customers are not the type of networks Chris Engel talks about. Residential and enterprise are the most distant points in a spectrum - residential *wants* e2e and p2p apps, while enterprise does *not* want that. This discussion has been rehashed a number of times now, and it's time that the "anti-NAT" crowd starts to accept that e2e is not a desirable property in some networks, and thus, this aspect of NAT doesn't do "harm". Gert Doering -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
