Hi, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:53:51AM -0700, Fred Baker wrote: > And I will argue that ILNP (which requires every host in the world > to be upgraded and therefore is IMHO a non-starter, although as a > solution I prefer it) or NAT66 as proposed in this document (which > reduces the problem to one of updating CPEs by updating the checksum) > handles both issues. The transit networks get to view their route > tables as entirely PA, and therefore as having been advertised by > O(10^4) ISPs or large corporate networks, and the edge networks get > the address independence they desire. That may be "broken" from > your perspective, but from the guy-paying-the-money's perspective > that is not broken. It is exactly what they are looking for.
Amen. Gert Doering -- did you enable IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
