Le 25 oct. 2010 à 18:11, Gert Doering a écrit : > I have not seen anybody in this thread talk about residential CPEs.
Well statements that something applies to all CPEs seemed to include unmanaged CPEs. I don't believe I misinterpreted, but sorry if I did. > To the contrary, my statement above was very clear: for residential, we > *want* e2e and p2p, and that implies "anything that breaks this is bad" > - and for residential, I don't see any benefits of NAT66 at all (in the > single-homed case). Good that we agree on that. At least between us, no more to be said. > But that's not what people are talking about here. For manage CPEs, the point that remains was in my previous mail: "As soon as you have a FW in a customer site, you don't need to break the e2e address preservation of IPv6 to protect this site, be it globally or selectively." RD > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > did you enable IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
