Remi, I have read the SAM work twice and, as you say, I don't understand it. Fine.
I am working on a solution that I understand to a problem that I think I understand. So far, Fred and I have been contacted by multiple people who are implementing this solution, and by some enterprise administrators who want to deploy it. We are trying to make something that works for them.
The fact that SAM _could_, in your opinion, be applied to the same problem is not really material to whether NAT66 resolves a problem in enterprise networks in a way that would help enterprises with their IPv6 deployment. The fact that I wrote this document doesn't stop you from writing your document, or from promoting it as a solution to anything you want to promote it as a solution to.
The fact exists, I have _not_ ignored you. I invested time in an effort to understand your solution, and apparently, even after spending hours on the attempt, I still don't understand it. Maybe that means that you should work on describing it more clearly? That doesn't really have anything to do with NAT66, though.
Margaret _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
