On Oct 31, 2010, at 06:19 , S.P.Zeidler wrote: > [Fred Baker] writes: >> >> If I could send a datagram that would follow the same path to the same DMZ, >> perhaps as an anycast or multicast, and get zero or more responses saying "I >> would have changed your source address to []", would that be adequate? > > That would probably be necessary.
But not sufficient. Evidence that a NAT was there in the not-so-distant past is not an assurance from the network that a NAT won't be changing in the not-so-distant future. -- james woodyatt <[email protected]> member of technical staff, communications engineering _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
