On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > I could go for "Algorithmic NAT66"... Would that address the concerns that > you and Remi have about calling it simply "NAT66"?
Or "stateless". Anything that would distinguish it from stateful network address translation, which is what triggers the filibuster and prevents discussion of the actual proposal. _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
