Poisonous atmosphere inside Aboriginal Affairs branch delaying settlement of 
treaty-related claims: letter

National News<http://aptn.ca/pages/news/category/national-news/> | 30. Sep, 
2013 by APTN National News<http://aptn.ca/pages/news/author/news/> | 0 
Comments<http://aptn.ca/pages/news/2013/09/30/poisonous-atmosphere-inside-aboriginal-affairs-branch-delaying-settlement-of-treaty-related-claims-letter/#disqus_thread>

http://aptn.ca/pages/news/2013/09/30/poisonous-atmosphere-inside-aboriginal-affairs-branch-delaying-settlement-of-treaty-related-claims-letter/

By Jorge Barrera
APTN National News
First Nation claims seeking redress from Ottawa over treaty-related wrongs face 
months-long delays over "insignificant issues," according an anonymous letter 
to Aboriginal Affairs Minister Bernard Valcourt penned by bureaucrats working 
in the departmental branch that handles the files.

The letter, which also alleged branch officials feel "bullied and intimidated" 
by their superiors has already led the department to hire a human resources 
consultant to deal with the issue, according to Valcourt's office.

"(Aboriginal Affairs) is aware of the letter in question," said Valcourt's 
office in an emailed statement. "The department has engaged an independent HR 
advisor to meet with staff and listen to employee concerns."

Valcourt's office said there would be no additional comment on "internal human 
resource management issues."

The letter, sent over the summer, paints a bleak picture of the Treaties and 
Aboriginal Government, Specific Claims branch and accuses management of 
arbitrarily holding up specific claim settlements with First Nations for months 
over matters that have little impact on the actual claim.

"Delays of several months is not unusual for even the most simplest and 
straightforward matter," said the letter, which was obtained by APTN National 
News. "Settlement agreements are needlessly delayed over minor and 
insignificant issues that have already been addressed. Constant and endless 
reviews come with continual requests for changes. These are not substantive 
changes....which do not change the substance of agreements...We believe this is 
largely due to micromanaging."

Specific claims centre on treaty-related grievances over Ottawa's mismanagement 
of First Nation funds and assets like land.

The letter claims the delays on settlement agreements are impacting Ottawa's 
relationship with First Nations.

APTN National News received only one page of the anonymous letter which was 
allegedly written by a "cross-section group of senior and experienced 
employees" as a "measure of last resort" after attempts to deal with the issue 
through the normal channels failed.

The letter claims that the branch is afflicted by low morale caused by "random 
and arbitrary decisions."

"We also feel bullied and intimidated. Our collective agreement rights are 
under constant attack by a management team that is aware that the delays, for 
example, in the grievance process allow them to ride roughshod," the letter 
states.

Aboriginal Affairs says it has settled 95 claims totaling $1.8 billion since 
2007 and cleared up a backlog of 541 claims at the assessment stage over the 
same time period.

Ottawa, in agreement with the Assembly of First Nation, created the Specific 
Claims Tribunal to handle claims rejected by the department or that reach a 
stalemate at the negotiating table. The tribunal was created in 2008 with the 
view it would have the final say on contested claims.

The tribunal's creation also led to the AFN backing away from a planned day of 
action on June 29, 2007, which led to the shut-down of Hwy 401 in Ontario for 
nearly 12 hours.

Critics say the department has been sending take-it or leave-it letters to 
First Nations to clear up its backlog and redirect claims to the tribunal.

The tribunal is currently handling about 46 claims.

This past March Ottawa took the tribunal to the Federal Court of Appeal over a 
ruling siding with the Kitselas First Nation in British Columbia over the loss 
of its village lands. It was only the second decision handed down by the 
tribunal since its inception.

[email protected]

@JorgeBarrera

Reply via email to