-----Original Message----- From: Marko Radojicic [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:23 AM To: Brad Segarini (E-mail) Subject: FW: NEBS & RBOCs
Hey Brad, For some reason, my messages never get through to the distribution list. Here is my response to Matt. ....Marko -----Original Message----- From: Marko Radojicic Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:53 PM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: NEBS & RBOCs Hi Matt, It's rare these days for any self-respecting next-gen product to pass these GR-63 requirements: * Heat release * Acoustics * Short-term temperature extremes That being said, there is still a lot of customer value in meeting these requirements (recall the GR-3028 committee that is looking at points 1 & 3). A little squishier are the geometry requirements. People are obviously violating the standards and getting away with it. If you don't meet the seismic, floor loading, operational vibration, and long-term temperature range requirements, you probably won't have much of a market. Cheers, Marko -----Original Message----- From: Matt Kilkenny [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:47 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: NEBS & RBOCs Has anyone ever seen or experienced a product sold to a RBOC that never passed all the GR-63 requirements? If so, what are the exceptions and why. Thanks in advance. Matt Kilkenny [email protected]
