Hi,
I started in that direction, making the tests happy while keeping non
accessible constructors, adding about.html for preparing a release and
providing an example tab ( see
https://github.com/cbrun/nebula/commits/master )
A few questions :
- Paperclips currently is versioned as 2.0, is that normal/expected ? I
would have expected to have a 1.0 version as the component, AFAIK, never
got released with the org.eclipse namespace.
- is there any official "branding" provider/vendor name used for Nebula ?
I expect it should be "Eclipse.org", right ?
Cheers,
Cédric
Le 05/08/2013 11:06, Wim Jongman a écrit :
forgot the ;) in my last mail.
Thanks Cedric for helping out to maintain the Paperclips widget. Did
you already look at the code during the time you used it? It would be
nice if you could start out by making PaperClips a little more
accessible, for example by adding the widgets to the examples view
[1], fixing the test and look at the information on the website [2]
(obviously, we cannot have a widget joining the release that declares
itself in ALPHA stage.)
Matthew, do you stick around for advice?
Best regards,
Wim
[1]
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Nebula/New_Contributions#Create_a_Contribution_to_the_Example_View
[2] http://www.eclipse.org/nebula/widgets/paperclips/paperclips.php
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Wim Jongman <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> The simplest solution would probably be to make those methods
public, but add a @noreference annotation to the Javadoc stating
that the method is for internal use only.
Veto!
Cheers,
Wim
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
