>
> I started in that direction, making the tests happy while keeping non
> accessible constructors, adding about.html for preparing a release and
> providing an example tab  ( see
> https://github.com/cbrun/nebula/commits/master )
>

Cool. Please file bugs for that so that we have some weight for your
committer vote.


>
> A few questions :
> - Paperclips currently is versioned as 2.0, is that normal/expected ? I
> would have expected to have a 1.0 version as the component, AFAIK, never
> got released with the org.eclipse namespace.
>

Whilst Nebula is moving to the 1.0.0 release, the individual components can
have other version numbers. so 2.x.x for PC is not a problem since it also
lived outside Nebula.


> - is there any official "branding" provider/vendor name used for Nebula ?
> I expect it should be "Eclipse.org", right ?
>

Yes. We sometimes see company names that provided that widget but AFAIK
once it is in the eclipse namespace the vendor should be Eclipse.org
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev

Reply via email to