The PaperClips 1.x stream was in the net.sf.paperclips package. To avoid
confusion with pre-Eclipse versions, I the Nebula package name to
org.eclipse.nebula.paperclips, and bumped the major version to 2.x.

I don't believe PaperClips has been released in Nebula yet, so the bump
from 2.0 to 2.1 is probably unnecessary.


On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Cédric Brun <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> I started in that direction, making the tests happy while keeping non
> accessible constructors, adding about.html for preparing a release and
> providing an example tab  ( see
> https://github.com/cbrun/nebula/commits/master )
>
> A few questions :
> - Paperclips currently is versioned as 2.0, is that normal/expected ? I
> would have expected to have a 1.0 version as the component, AFAIK, never
> got released with the org.eclipse namespace.
> - is there any official "branding" provider/vendor name used for Nebula ?
> I expect it should be "Eclipse.org", right ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cédric
>
> Le 05/08/2013 11:06, Wim Jongman a écrit :
>
>  forgot the ;) in my last mail.
>
>  Thanks Cedric for helping out to maintain the Paperclips widget. Did you
> already look at the code during the time you used it? It would be nice if
> you could start out by making PaperClips a little more accessible, for
> example by adding the widgets to the examples view [1], fixing the test and
> look at the information on the website [2] (obviously, we cannot have a
> widget joining the release that declares itself in ALPHA stage.)
>
>  Matthew, do you stick around for advice?
>
>  Best regards,
>
>  Wim
>
>  [1]
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Nebula/New_Contributions#Create_a_Contribution_to_the_Example_View
> [2] http://www.eclipse.org/nebula/widgets/paperclips/paperclips.php
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Wim Jongman <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> > The simplest solution would probably be to make those methods public,
>> but add a @noreference annotation to the Javadoc stating that the method is
>> for internal use only.
>>
>>  Veto!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Wim
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing 
> [email protected]https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
nebula-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev

Reply via email to