On Saturday, January 1, 2005, at 10:50:09 AM, Steve Berczuk wrote:
> But what if you have a "complete" set of tests that takes, say, an
> hour....
This is the bug. We should fix it.
> would you want to wait for that to finish before moving on,
> or, having done some sanity checks before checking is, is it better to
> move on and then go back to fix things if the build happens to fail
> (which may not be likely)?
Of course, move on. But is the right way to move on to automate the
hour-long build? Perhaps not.
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
You can observe a lot by watching. --Yogi Berra
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
