Ron Jeffries wrote:
> If more than one pair release has taken place, we really don't know
> what caused the problem when the thousand year tests fail. That's
> not good. If our thoughts have moved on, that's not good.
>
> Therefore -- in my opinion -- the vector should point in the
> direction of getting all the necessary info instantly, not in the
> direction of tolerating and accommodating slow feedback.
Shouldn't it point towards effectiveness? Important but non urgent feedback
can certainly be delayed. It is this sort of feedback that the asynchronous
builds are designed to give (as well as being a safety net for the normal
developer builds).
--
"Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
Robert Watkins http://twasink.net/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
