Gary Feldman wrote:
> Why do you say that? I recently deployed Emma (Java coverage) in our
> build file for one component, making it both fast and easy for
> developers to get coverage data. It's trivial for the developers to
> run, and it creates a good target for them when doing after-the-fact
> unit testing. (This isn't an XP or TDD shop - yet.)
I don't know about Emma, but the one that I use (Clover) can't be used
readily in conjunction with a production-like environment. Having to blow
away and rebuild just because you want to deploy an application gets really
annoying (this, BTW, is exactly what the CruiseControl build target does).
--
"Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
Robert Watkins http://twasink.net/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
