2 cents
 
I don't think the problem is only eye-dee ten-tee issues.  Not being  sure 
of the limit of an attachment, it may be a waste of BW or time for people  
on slower connections.  "I know it's a virus, but I can't resist. - I have  
to push the button." or "Baitcar"
 
I don't care if the file is PHP or someones signature.  No one needs  to 
prove to me that they are who they say they are in a forum.  It's not  like 
someone is going to tell me to touch mains and then say it wasn't  them.
 
YOU may not get a virus, but what about the person next door riding your  
wifi, you wife, kid in the other room, room mate, etc.
 
Honestly, doesn't matter to me either way, but I see turning it off simply  
protects everyone instantly.  Leaving it on protects everyone until it  
doesn't.
 
Isn't including links in a post enough?  Or putting the file in the  
downloads section?
 
Again, not a complaint.  I don't care either way.  I just don't  have an 
argument FOR attachments.
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/9/2010 7:03:39 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

On  9/9/2010 3:20 AM, yendor3 wrote:
> The 'abused' aspect is the pivotal  one.
> Another group I receive from allows attachments. One of the  less
> computer-literate members sent out bundles of photos. He didn't  let 
Windows
> resize them [for the email] because he thought it would  also resize his
> original files. Some of the members are still on  dial-up too.

This is the /exact/ reason IMAP4 was built.

> I  don't really mind attachments from trusted sources.
> But, on another  group a member's computer became infected and even 
though he
> is  'trusted' as far as his own input is concerned the result is that I  
still
> really don't know.

as long as the files being moved  around are /non-executable/ you're
good. No really. A JPEG isn't going to  do you any good if its infected
because it WONT OPEN in a reasonable  viewer. 'infected text files' is a
misnomer.


> Even if we all  have the 'latest' protections operating they only protect 
us
> from  'old' problems. The latest 'nasty' can still bite; takes time for 
the
>  protection software to catch up.

See above...

> I can't see  any need for attachments.
> Any given attachment won't be of interest to  all the members.
> Some members accidently answer a communal post to the  community when they
> actually meant to take it off-line - the answer  could be BIG attachments 
of
> manuals/pics/scans etc going to  everyone.

... You can't stop Eye-Dee Ten Tees.

> I can't  think of any "good arguments as to why we shouldn't have them
>  anyway..." , BUT I can think of even less arguments as to why we SHOULD  
have
> them.

I can think of a few good reasons for keeping them.  For example I use
PGP to sign my email. As an experiment, I'm going to be  using PGP/MIME
which attaches the sign hash as 'signature.asc' with the  MIMEtype
PGP/Signature

> There have been moanings about other  various functions that seem to be 
set
> default ON, maybe this fits that  category. It should be considered 
default
> Off and good reasons  advanced for turning On  ??
[...]
> And, didn't someone in the  past complain that attachments didn't/wouldn't
> get into the archive  and are thus lost? [This might have been during the
> previous (last  year?) discussions re a new venue for the group.]

Unfortunately there's  no solution that fits both sides easily, I dont
think. Its either on and  one side of that argument is happy and has
archival on, or the other side  is happy and we don't have that archival.

FWIW, the Cygwin (a POSIX  layer for Windows) allows attachments on its
mailing lists. These mailing  lists I've /given up on trying to read
regularly/ anymore. they get 400+  emails a /day/ on good day, 200+ on a
bad one. Without those attachments,  we'd have /really/ long emails.


( Late thought: Allow only certain  filetypes. )
-- 

Morgan Gangwere

>> Why?
>  Because it breaks the logical flow of conversation, plus makes
messages  unreadable.
>>> Top-Posting is  evil.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/neonixie-l?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to