On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 12:00:43 UTC+4, Chuck wrote: > > Seriously? SOIC version of K1551D1? > Why? I really do not see any need for it. >
Commercially, I doubt that it would make much sense, considering the likely volumes and the alternatives available. However, it's kind of cute that it's been done - if you wanted to build a traditional clock using TTL and old-school techniques, but wanted to avoid PTH components, you can now do that. Price is not that bad either. Nick -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "neonixie-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/d5112bce-5dd0-4441-96ec-2dada1562147%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
