On Tuesday, 10 April 2018 12:00:43 UTC+4, Chuck wrote:
> Seriously?  SOIC version of K1551D1? 
> Why?  I really do not see any need for it. 

Commercially, I doubt that it would make much sense, considering the likely 
volumes and the alternatives available.

However, it's kind of cute that it's been done - if you wanted to build a 
traditional clock using TTL and old-school techniques, but wanted to avoid 
PTH components, you can now do that. 

Price is not that bad either.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to