Thanks! I looked up that chip and found a lot of useful info.

Jim

On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:47:21 PM UTC-6, [email protected] 
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 7:50:55 AM UTC-7, Jim KO5V wrote:
> >... My guess is that this is more than just adding in a circuit with a 
> battery - a frequency source may also be needed. 
>
> If you want an integrated solution instead of adding an outboard UPS, 
> consider this:
>
> All my ideas are stolen from the Cal-Tex CT7001 clock/calendar chip.  They 
> recommend using a battery to keep the logic alive. 
>
> Their clever idea was to use the MUX oscillator to help keep time when the 
> mains were out.  You could emulate this idea by building a 60 Hz source 
> that was phase-locked to the line frequency (and very close to 60 Hz 
> free-running), possibly based on a NE565 or NE555.  This could also improve 
> the time keeping in normal operation, since the clock would be more immune 
> to the noise spikes on the power line (my clocks based on MM5531x chips, 
> TTL logic, and CMOS logic all ran slightly fast and I blame that on 
> counting excess noise pulses).  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/c3e0f2d0-ec3b-4a41-98fb-66a3d029013d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to