Both transistors are rated for 500mA, so I don’t see why you need a MJE340 for 
an IN-9. This is particularly relevant for me as I want to switch around 50mA 
using 3.3V. Not sure what the voltage is right now, given that this is the 
cathode.

> On Apr 22, 2020, at 5:25 PM, Mac Doktor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 22, 2020, at 9:39 AM, '[email protected]' via neonixie-l 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I would say whichever is cheaper, keeping in mind that nothing is cheaper 
>> than free from the junque box.  I used the floor sweepings  (advertised as 
>> npn 300V and 10W) from Poly Paks, and none of these have failed yet.  I did 
>> have one genuine Motorola MPSA92 fail after 40 years of service.  Just make 
>> sure you are driving your transistors into saturation.  Obviously TO92 is 
>> smaller than TO220, and this might be a factor in your application.
> 
> 
> The perfect example of this is driving an IN-13 vs an IN-9. The former will 
> work with an MPSA42 but the latter requires an MJE340 because of the higher 
> current. It's well known that the bargraph tubes work more reliably if 
> they're strobed; all of the circuit examples in Russian data sheets for the 
> IN-9 and IN-13 use a half-wave rectified 220V mains power source. And now I 
> finally understand a circuit modification I saw in a forum thread that has 
> puzzled me for some time. The OP couldn't get an IN-9 (using an MJE340 of 
> course) to work reliably using a generic barpgraph driver circuit. One of the 
> replies added a 555 running at 50Hz driving a MPSA42 in series with the 
> MJE340. What? How could you use the smaller trans... Now I get it. The MPSA42 
> was being used as a switch. DUHH.
> 
> Thank you for that insight. Cue up the next great mystery of life...
> 
> 
> Terry Bowman, KA4HJH
> "The Mac Doctor"
> 
> https://www.astarcloseup.com/
> 
> "Every kid starts out as a natural-born scientist, and then we beat it out of 
> them. A few trickle through the system with their wonder and enthusiasm for 
> science intact."—Carl Sagan, Psychology Today, 1996
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/neonixie-l/_TX-Z5A27JQ/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/B30CB5AB-765F-4F1C-AC1C-8F7D176739EE%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/2B974D07-C761-433F-940A-410F98EC4823%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to