If you have an isolation transformer, can you put a scope on the cathode 
line to verify the ripple is not excessive ? Rk and Ck create an RC filter 
around 77Hz, and the line is 50-60Hz, so there could be some ripple.

On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 8:26:51 PM UTC-8 [email protected] wrote:

> I tried varying it with absolutely no effect. It runs perfectly at 5v with 
> the capacitor moved to the other side of the resistor. However I was 
> clocking slowly. It may not run at spec speed. I seem to remember reading 
> of using 5 to 8 volts for the logic.
> The data sheet shows the following which I'm inclined to believe. I will 
> try Ck directly on the pins tomorrow. Someone must have tried this circuit.
> [image: 8453 Cct.JPG]
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:12 PM gregebert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I suspect the differential voltage between lit vs non-lit numerals is too 
>> low. The CMOS device is basically driving grids to determine which cathode 
>> will be illuminated. I've seen similar behavior with an A-101 dekatron. 
>> What voltage are you using for VDD ? Is it 8V as indicated on the 
>> schematic, or a more-conventional 5V ?
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 7:22:25 PM UTC-8 [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think you are wrong. The literature explains this tube is designed to 
>>> be driven by 5v logic and it does work. The steering electrodes are close 
>>> to the Anode voltage which is grounded and only 5v pulses (square waves) 
>>> are needed. Note all the cathodes are connected together internally.
>>> I got to thinking about the C1 position. The data sheet shows it per my 
>>> schematic and I can't believe they made that mistake several times 
>>> including the hand drawn notes of the designer. I think maybe I needed to 
>>> have C1 directly on the socket pins and will try that tomorrow.
>>> Thanks for your interest though but you are thinking Nixie Tubes, this 
>>> is a special tube with steering electrodes..
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:42 PM chuckrr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That schematic is so wrong in so many ways.   You need high voltage 
>>>> transistors operating the tube cathodes.
>>>>
>>>> You need high resistance drving the transistor bases.   You need a 
>>>> buffer such as 4049 or 4050 driving the
>>>>
>>>> resistor, which in turn drives the transistor base.  Only then would I 
>>>> dare to use the 4028....to operate the buffer, which in turn operates the
>>>>
>>>> transistor base via appropriate high resistance.  That is the only sure 
>>>> fire way I know of to attain noise-free performance from CMOS logic
>>>>
>>>> driving cold cathode tubes.   That schematic there is a noisy deal.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ---- Original Message ----
>>>> From: "peter bunge" <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: 2/10/2021 8:15:21 PM
>>>> To: "neonixie-l" <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: [neonixie-l] 8453/Z550M erratic
>>>>
>>>> Using the schematic from the data sheet
>>>> [image: 8453 Circuit.jpg]
>>>> This works with the count moving around but other numbers flash 
>>>> erratically, especially close to the number that is supposed to be lit.
>>>> *When I moved  the bottom of C1 to the other side of R1 it works 
>>>> perfectly.  It is rock steady and does not care about line voltage or the 
>>>> 5v supply (shown above as 8v but used at 5v)*
>>>> If this is an error it is continued through all the documentation and 
>>>> is consistent. Changing the value of C1 up and down by 10 had little 
>>>> effect 
>>>> but a smaller C1 helps a bit. My Rst are all directly on the socket pins 
>>>> and the wires are all about 5 inches long.
>>>> I have varied the line voltage with little effect. 
>>>> Any suggestions???
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b996ef0b-edbb-4c77-8ec1-57255dd58a82n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/b996ef0b-edbb-4c77-8ec1-57255dd58a82n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/202102101842701.SM05295%40ADT-IM1
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/202102101842701.SM05295%40ADT-IM1?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9543e23e-ebb0-46e7-8624-ddcf4a843667n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9543e23e-ebb0-46e7-8624-ddcf4a843667n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/9281e612-84bd-45bf-8cad-a239bed5c9b1n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to