I couldn't resist asking google Bard this question: Are IN-1 nixie tubes 
reliable ?
Well, here's the answer. Feel free to laugh.....love the part about the 
filaments. Geez, maybe that's why I had so much trouble with mine ?

IN-1 nixie tubes are generally reliable, but they can fail over time. The 
most common failure mode is a leak in the vacuum tube. This can happen due 
to a number of factors, including manufacturing defects, physical damage, 
or exposure to extreme temperatures.

If a leak develops, the tube will slowly fill with air and the filaments 
will eventually burn out. This can happen over a period of months or even 
years. To prevent leaks, it is important to store IN-1 nixie tubes in a 
cool, dry place and to avoid dropping or banging them.

Another potential failure mode is a failure of the heater filament. This 
can happen due to a number of factors, including overheating, overvoltage, 
or physical damage. If the heater filament fails, the tube will not light 
up.

To prevent heater filament failures, it is important to use a regulated 
power supply and to avoid exceeding the maximum operating voltage.

On Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 2:03:54 PM UTC-7 gregebert wrote:

> I never had an IN-1 run long enough to get poisoned. Mine developed 
> internal shorts, resulting in 2 numerals glowing at the same time.
> From what I've heard, nixie degradation increases exponentially with 
> current, so you want to stay as close as possible to normal operating 
> current. Try running the worst digit continuously for a few hours at 20% 
> higher current, and see if that helps. I was (briefly) drawn to the IN-1 
> over 10 years ago because of the large size for the low cost; I bought a 
> case of 25 for around 40USD including shipping. Only a few survive today 
> that weren't dissected or tortured in a microwave oven (yeah, pretty 
> hilarious but kinda toxic because of the bakelite).
>
> A few of the IN-18's in my clock have shown signs of poisoning even though 
> I run a cleansing routine for 1 hour every night. This is most-visible on 
> the first day of the month for the months digit, and it can take a few days 
> to recover. This clock has 14 tubes; kinda ridiculous but it looks 
> impressive. It was inspired by the movie "Tomorrowland", which has a brief 
> scene with two 6-digit IN-18 clocks. I'm certain one of our neonixie 
> members is the creator of that clock (that was an invitation for you to 
> take a well-deserved bow...).
>
> Tubes that run 0-9 during the day need no cleansing (unit seconds, unit 
> minutes, unit hours). Tubes the run 0-5 during the day are cleansed by 
> running 6-9 (tens seconds, tens minutes). Tubes that are static, or near 
> static (tens hours, month, day, year) run 0-9 for cleansing. 
>
> The static tubes, notably the 4-digit year, show very little signs of 
> poisoning because I have swapped them around to put the 
> most-vulnerable-to-poisoning tubes where they run 0-9 during the day.
>
> I havn't seen any signs of poisoning on Burroughs tubes.
>
> On Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 11:39:54 AM UTC-7 Benoit Tourret wrote:
>
>> Hello, I have some IN-1 that seems to be poisoned. poisoned or rather 
>> oxided, as they seems to  be really new. it is fine mesh from September 
>> 1971.
>> two of them are fine after one or two day, tree other doesn't show any 
>> improvement.
>>
>> I read that I must overload them a while but how many and how long should 
>> I keep one digit on before light the next digit ? is it 1 second or one 
>> day...
>>
>> by the way, as I read that this tube doesn't have mercury inside, can it 
>> be unpoisonned ?
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/61137a91-eefa-4a14-bd84-e173bf4af97bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to