In order to be able to talk about the same thing, I have a few questions 
regarding my DC power supply.
I have in order: a 0-30V / 0-10A adjustable DC power supply, a  NCH6100HV 
(12-24V 
to 85-235V HV) module, a 0-300V DC voltmeter, a 0-30mA ammeter and a 32.4 
kΩ  limiting resistor  mounted on the wire that goes to the tube.
in my opinion, the voltmeter should be in place of the resistance and vice 
versa. so far, am I okay?

If I replace the adjustable resistor of the HT module with a potentiometer 
on the front, I can modify the voltage.
My current limiting resistor (a USSR model salvaged from a IN-12 nixie 
board) measures 10mm x 4mm. I have no idea of its power or the power 
needed, as I want to change the intensity, I have to replace my resistor 
with a second potentiometer.
I thought of a potentiometer of 50 or 100k. But what power... a small 
Chinese knob or a large rehostat of 200 kilograms?
I don't want to power much more than 5 or 6 tubes.
Until now my DC power supply never showed anything other than 0.00 A

Am I completely off the mark or is it doable?
I also have a DC-DC yh11068a module 
(https://dalmura.com.au/static/YH11068A.pdf

Here in France, ebay is not used by companies to resell their used 
equipment. Removing an item from an inventory requires tons of paperwork. 
So, finding a power supply for an EDM machine is rather complicated.

Le vendredi 21 avril 2023 à 23:41:38 UTC+2, Moses a écrit :

> I've always just "unpoisoned" tubes with slightly higher current then 
> normal, not higher voltage. A couple of hours to a few days usually fixes 
> them for me. I don't think a 150-200% overdrive on the current will hurt it 
> too much for a short duration. I've seen some tubes unpoisoned right in 
> front of my eyes after just a few minutes at around double the current.
>
> I've used brand new tubes where some digits didn't light fully.. usually 
> after a few days of normal usage, at normal current levels, they came back. 
> I've always viewed this as normal. I figure they have been sitting unlit 
> for decades, it may take a little while to get everything lit up.
>
> Regards,
> -Moses
>
> On Friday, April 21, 2023 at 1:19:55 PM UTC-7 Benoit Tourret wrote:
>
>> I don't know how to rise the intensity...
>> I wish I had a laboratory DC power supply, but mine stops at 30V.
>> so I put a  NCH6300HV to raise the voltage. If I can adjust the voltage, 
>> I cannot adjust anything else. 
>> however I added a voltmeter and ammeter to check what I'm sending to the 
>> tube. Do you know if there is an adjustable power supply that can be used 
>> for our beloved tubes?
>> So, I regulate the voltage and I check that I do not exceed the desired 
>> values.
>>
>> should I change the 32K resistor between the PS and the tube? could a 
>> potentiometer be used?
>>
>> So I did see an improvement. but some need to be "heated". I of course 
>> doesn't speak of temperature, but they need 10 to 20 seconds to get their 
>> full glow, a bit like a neon tube with an old starter.
>> They are 52 years old now and never been used.
>>
>> Le vendredi 21 avril 2023 à 16:20:59 UTC+2, gregebert a écrit :
>>
>>> The IN-1 datasheet says 2.5mA typical operating current, so you should 
>>> try cleaning the other 3 tubes at just under 3mA. The other 7 tubes might 
>>> clean-up on their own at normal current if the usage is balanced.
>>>
>>> So did you see some improvement ? 
>>>
>>> On Friday, April 21, 2023 at 12:14:05 AM UTC-7 Benoit Tourret wrote:
>>>
>>>> I ran each tube with 180V 2mA / two hours, turning each plate for 2 
>>>> minutes.
>>>>
>>>> on 10 tubes:
>>>>
>>>> 7 are OK
>>>> 3 are not perfect.
>>>>
>>>> I will wait to be able to lit them all together.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le jeudi 20 avril 2023 à 01:27:40 UTC+2, gregebert a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> I couldn't resist asking google Bard this question: Are IN-1 nixie 
>>>>> tubes reliable ?
>>>>> Well, here's the answer. Feel free to laugh.....love the part about 
>>>>> the filaments. Geez, maybe that's why I had so much trouble with mine ?
>>>>>
>>>>> IN-1 nixie tubes are generally reliable, but they can fail over time. 
>>>>> The most common failure mode is a leak in the vacuum tube. This can 
>>>>> happen 
>>>>> due to a number of factors, including manufacturing defects, physical 
>>>>> damage, or exposure to extreme temperatures.
>>>>>
>>>>> If a leak develops, the tube will slowly fill with air and the 
>>>>> filaments will eventually burn out. This can happen over a period of 
>>>>> months 
>>>>> or even years. To prevent leaks, it is important to store IN-1 nixie 
>>>>> tubes 
>>>>> in a cool, dry place and to avoid dropping or banging them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another potential failure mode is a failure of the heater filament. 
>>>>> This can happen due to a number of factors, including overheating, 
>>>>> overvoltage, or physical damage. If the heater filament fails, the tube 
>>>>> will not light up.
>>>>>
>>>>> To prevent heater filament failures, it is important to use a 
>>>>> regulated power supply and to avoid exceeding the maximum operating 
>>>>> voltage.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 2:03:54 PM UTC-7 gregebert wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I never had an IN-1 run long enough to get poisoned. Mine developed 
>>>>>> internal shorts, resulting in 2 numerals glowing at the same time.
>>>>>> From what I've heard, nixie degradation increases exponentially with 
>>>>>> current, so you want to stay as close as possible to normal operating 
>>>>>> current. Try running the worst digit continuously for a few hours at 20% 
>>>>>> higher current, and see if that helps. I was (briefly) drawn to the IN-1 
>>>>>> over 10 years ago because of the large size for the low cost; I bought a 
>>>>>> case of 25 for around 40USD including shipping. Only a few survive today 
>>>>>> that weren't dissected or tortured in a microwave oven (yeah, pretty 
>>>>>> hilarious but kinda toxic because of the bakelite).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A few of the IN-18's in my clock have shown signs of poisoning even 
>>>>>> though I run a cleansing routine for 1 hour every night. This is 
>>>>>> most-visible on the first day of the month for the months digit, and it 
>>>>>> can 
>>>>>> take a few days to recover. This clock has 14 tubes; kinda ridiculous 
>>>>>> but 
>>>>>> it looks impressive. It was inspired by the movie "Tomorrowland", which 
>>>>>> has 
>>>>>> a brief scene with two 6-digit IN-18 clocks. I'm certain one of our 
>>>>>> neonixie members is the creator of that clock (that was an invitation 
>>>>>> for 
>>>>>> you to take a well-deserved bow...).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tubes that run 0-9 during the day need no cleansing (unit seconds, 
>>>>>> unit minutes, unit hours). Tubes the run 0-5 during the day are cleansed 
>>>>>> by 
>>>>>> running 6-9 (tens seconds, tens minutes). Tubes that are static, or near 
>>>>>> static (tens hours, month, day, year) run 0-9 for cleansing. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The static tubes, notably the 4-digit year, show very little signs of 
>>>>>> poisoning because I have swapped them around to put the 
>>>>>> most-vulnerable-to-poisoning tubes where they run 0-9 during the day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I havn't seen any signs of poisoning on Burroughs tubes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 18, 2023 at 11:39:54 AM UTC-7 Benoit Tourret wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello, I have some IN-1 that seems to be poisoned. poisoned or 
>>>>>>> rather oxided, as they seems to  be really new. it is fine mesh from 
>>>>>>> September 1971.
>>>>>>> two of them are fine after one or two day, tree other doesn't show 
>>>>>>> any improvement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I read that I must overload them a while but how many and how long 
>>>>>>> should I keep one digit on before light the next digit ? is it 1 second 
>>>>>>> or 
>>>>>>> one day...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> by the way, as I read that this tube doesn't have mercury inside, 
>>>>>>> can it be unpoisonned ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/ea5990ac-e403-4f2a-ab25-68ac223375b5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to