My first nixie clock with 5092 tubes has been running since 2011. I use 
+340VDC for the anodes, and of course the anode resistors are appropriately 
increased to give the optimum 2.2mA of current.

So, why did I choose 340VDC when the mains here in the US are 120V RMS ? 
This clock has no transformer, so either I would use approx +170VDC from 
rectifying the line directly and risk being too close to the minimum 
voltage, or just use a voltage-doubler and deal with the slightly higher 
wasted energy.

On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 1:02:27 PM UTC-7 Audrey wrote:

> I thought I had heard/read that lower voltage was better, though a cursory 
> search suggests that the rate of sputtering is nearly directly proportional 
> to current, so that makes sense, the only reason aside from arcing that I 
> could think of would be making the internal wires glow
>
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023, 3:52 PM liam bartosiewicz <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Another note about firing voltage is that in general, using higher 
>> voltages for nixies, ie. >200V increases lifespan, assuming the proper 
>> anode resistor is used.
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2023, at 11:13 AM, Nicholas Stock <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I've noticed a few 7971's needing a couple of hours to fully illuminate 
>> after which they're apparently very happy in the long term if in operation. 
>> Is this sign of a very small leak or something else? I'm not sure what to 
>> make of the 'gassy' term to be honest....were 7971's doped with Hg?
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2023, at 10:42, Paul Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> I’ve had some of these tubes that require a higher than normal voltage to 
>> even trigger. Most people drive nixies at 170V, but this can be a marginal 
>> trigger voltage for some tubes and completely insufficient for others such 
>> as the GR10G https://www.nixies.us/bwg_gallery/gr10g/
>>
>> Shining light on a tube ionizes the gas inside, the brighter the light, 
>> the more ions. Tubes used in dark environments can take longer to light up. 
>> Once they are lit, the number of free ions in the gas is usually enough to 
>> keep it going. Several approaches were used to circumvent this. Some tubes 
>> have an extra cathode driven with a very low current that is always on. 
>> Some tubes were doped with Krypton 85, a radioactive gas, e.g. 
>> https://www.nixies.us/bwg_gallery/122p224/
>> On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 12:13:47 PM UTC-4 gregebert wrote:
>>
>>> Can you do some bench-testing to see if the segments fully light with a 
>>> bit more voltage ?
>>> I collected current-voltage (I-V) data on all my 7971's so I can check 
>>> them for aging effects.
>>>
>>> On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 6:01:55 AM UTC-7 [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Jim, 
>>>>   
>>>> If you have a source of UV-light, that will do a good job. 
>>>> Maybe an UV-Led beneath the tube will do the trick.... 
>>>>   
>>>> BR/ 
>>>> Guus 
>>>>
>>>> Op 07-10-2023 19:26 CEST schreef Jim KO5V <[email protected]>: 
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>   
>>>> I have a B7971 that doesn't want to light up - the ends of some 
>>>> segments will glow,  but none will illuminate along their entire length. I 
>>>> have had tubes in the past that were probably a bit gassy, and they 
>>>> cleaned 
>>>> up after running for a few minutes to a few hours. 
>>>>   
>>>> So, I put it into the "10 second" position of my Mod 6 clock, and ran 
>>>> it over night with no improvement. However after I had been up an hour or 
>>>> so, I noticed that the tube's segments were lighting up along about 3/4 of 
>>>> their lengths, and also that the low morning sun was shining on the clock. 
>>>> This state lasted for as long as the sunlight was on the tube - sometime 
>>>> after light moved off of the clock, the tube went back to it's wounded 
>>>> state.  
>>>>   
>>>> This morning I watched as the sunlight moved toward the clock, and as 
>>>> soon as the light hit the clock, the tube immediately recovered, and 
>>>> performed like it did yesterday. However, that state lasted for about 
>>>> 3-1/2 
>>>> hours after the sunlight moved away. I then shined a flashlight on the 
>>>> tube, and it recovered as long as the light was there.  
>>>>   
>>>> I guess this is some kind of photo-voltaic effect. I have a bit of 
>>>> education in basic physics (for engineering), and this baffles me - but 
>>>> it's cool! 
>>>>   
>>>> I have a reading lamp that puts out a full spectrum, so I will put that 
>>>> on the clock today and see what happens. I may also set up a test to run 
>>>> the tube at a bit higher voltage (180-ish V). It may never recover 
>>>> completely, but I think this is a fun exercise. 
>>>>   
>>>> Anyway, and ideas are welcome. I may not be able to save the tube, but 
>>>> I might actually learn something.  Thanks.  Jim 
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "neonixie-l" group. 
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected]. 
>>>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/d2784c4a-c76f-4ae6-b0b1-86f14185bb22n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/d2784c4a-c76f-4ae6-b0b1-86f14185bb22n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/84ecf40e-cfbd-4d8b-a287-8be443d1cf08n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/84ecf40e-cfbd-4d8b-a287-8be443d1cf08n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/A2B96120-7BE5-46F4-859B-01C0715D6D8D%40gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/A2B96120-7BE5-46F4-859B-01C0715D6D8D%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "neonixie-l" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
> To view this discussion on the web, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/F0506BFC-9BD4-47F0-A824-13F4643C190F%40gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/F0506BFC-9BD4-47F0-A824-13F4643C190F%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/ac73d146-0452-4768-8c83-ce1d023d9ab1n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to