@gregebert 
*Are you driving the HV5530's with the correct signal levels?* I believe so 
- using a CD4504BE set to CMOS.
*Secondly, are you giving enough dead-time before-and-after wiggling the 
clock signal ?*  I'm not including any delay in code but will revisit the 
datasheet and experiment.

@Richard
Does that help? - Yes, thank you. I won't be able to check until later but 
I think I'm setting the latch low before shifting data in. I have a couple 
of queries please..

unsigned char BitArray[96 / 8]; 
What is the significance of 96/8 or is this good coding practice? (ChatGPT 
called it 'clarity of intent :)) What was the reason for choosing 12 8 bit 
elements? Are you able to share how you populate the array with data for a 
digit?

Thanks.


On Tuesday, 25 March 2025 at 04:19:51 UTC Richard Scales wrote:

> I am using SPI with multiple HV5522's (these work the same as HV5530's as 
> far as this example goes) with total success.
>
> The point about the 12V logic supply to these devices is based on the fact 
> that the specification clearly states that they need 12V logic and whilst 
> many have run them at 5V logic with complete success - for the sake of a 
> level shifter I have always played it safe and stuck with 12V. I see that 
> you are using a CD4504BE which I guess would be fine, I use CD40109B with 
> total success.
>
> Why use SPI at all? Whilst i am no expert, simply put - instead of you 
> performing the bit bashing via Shiftout or some similar routine, the SPI 
> process leaves the job to the processor which takes the pressure off your 
> code a little - which is never a bad thing. I use Wemos Mini D1's (ESP8266) 
> so not as beefy as ESP32 and on the D1 you are restricted to using only 
> certain pins for the SPI transfer, I believe it may be different for the 
> ESP32.
>
> When using SPI transfers I just point the SPI transfer command to the 
> buffer that contains my data and the micro does the rest. So far I have 
> driven 4 x HV55xx devices in a row transferring 128 bits in one fell swoop 
> with total success.
>
> There is also a 'thing' about when the latch signal should be toggled. My 
> understanding is that the Latch signal should be generally low and when you 
> want to latch the data to the outputs, set it High then Low again.
>
> Here is a snip of my code for sending data out to 3 x HV55xx devices in a 
> chain, note the commented out ShiftOut commands which are all replaced by 
> the single SPI.transfer command:
>
>   // send data out
>   SPI.transfer(&BitArray, sizeof(BitArray));
>   /*
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[11]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[10]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[9]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[8]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[7]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[6]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[5]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[4]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[3]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[2]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[1]);
>       shiftOut(dataPin, clockPin, MSBFIRST, BitArray[0]);
>
>   */
>
>   digitalWrite(LEpin, HIGH);
>   digitalWrite(LEpin, LOW);
>
>
> Then after the data has all been sent, send the latch pin High and then 
> Low to latch the data to the output pins.
>
> In the above example, BitArray was defined as follows:
>
> unsigned char BitArray[96 / 8]; // space for 96 bits
>
>
> ... so it is a char array with 12 elements.
>
> All signals going to the HV55xx are at 12V logic levels (CLK, DATA, LATCH 
> and POL).
>
> Does that help?
>
> - Richard
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 25 March 2025 at 01:25:30 UTC gregebert wrote:
>
>> Are you driving the HV5530's with the correct signal levels ? Per the 
>> datasheet, they should be 0 or +12V, but many have been able to run them at 
>> TTL-levels and that can lead to intermittent problems.
>>
>> Secondly, are you giving enough dead-time before-and-after wiggling the 
>> clock signal ? If not, there could be a race condition, which can get 
>> worsened if not running at 12V logic levels.
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 25, 2025 at 4:52:13 AM UTC+7 JBro63 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> Ok so some progress. First PCBs have arrived and the K155ID1 IN12 based 
>>> clock is almost complete. I also knocked up a very basic breakout board for 
>>> a PLCC 44 pin socket to allow me to start testing with the HV5530 with a 
>>> breadboard and am having mixed results.
>>>
>>> To learn how to use the HV5530 I'm using LEDs connected to the outputs, 
>>> each with a 220 ohm resistor in series in place of the nixie tubes and the 
>>> connections from an ESP32 go through a CD4504BE with VDD at 12v. The LEDs 
>>> have a common +5V and the POL pin on the HV5530 is tied to +12v
>>>
>>> https://reboots.g-cipher.net/time/ disusses how to write data to the 
>>> driver.
>>>
>>> With only a single HV5530 connected and using digitalWrite() I'm able to 
>>> blank / light all outputs reliably or target a single output. There is some 
>>> flicker if I 'disturb' the wires on the breadboard but otherwise seems 
>>> good. Adding a second driver (shared clock & latch pin, DO on driver one 
>>> connected to DIN on driver two) causes all LEDs to flicker randomly and 
>>> those on the second driver are not in the correct sequence.
>>>
>>> Using a separate set of pins for each driver improves things - the LEDs 
>>> on driver two light as programmed - but there is still some flickering 
>>> evident on all LEDs.
>>>
>>> Is there anything obvious I can change in the above to improve matters? 
>>> I've seen several references to SPI but am 1) unsure why one would choose 
>>> SPI over digitalWrite() and 2) it seems more difficult to implement. If 
>>> anyone has a very simple example how to use SPI with the HV5530 and ESP32 I 
>>> would be grateful.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> On Monday, 10 March 2025 at 11:49:58 UTC JBro63 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Ian, that's really helpful.
>>>>
>>>> On Saturday, 8 March 2025 at 08:33:06 UTC Ian Sparkes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They work fine at 5V. Never had a problem with one at 5V.
>>>>>
>>>>> But attention: ESP uses 3V3 and you might need to use a lever shifter 
>>>>> (e.g. CD40109) to make it work.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, 3 March 2025 at 20:39:00 UTC+1 newxito wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I use the HV5622, which goes up to 220 V, I think there is also a 
>>>>>> PLCC version. The disadvantages are the price and that it should  be 
>>>>>> operated with 12V according to spec. However, I never had any problems 
>>>>>> using the chip with 5V. 
>>>>>> JBro63 schrieb am Montag, 3. März 2025 um 19:02:56 UTC+1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Group noob here, about to start build on a few different types of 
>>>>>>> display using Nixie tubes and ESP32.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Planning to use K155ID1 initially (as I have a bunch) with some 
>>>>>>> IN-12 and IN14 tubes but want to also try HV driver such as the 5812 or 
>>>>>>> 5530 so would welcome any comment on which is the best one to go for or 
>>>>>>> an 
>>>>>>> alternative. I don't intend to multiplex. Any driver would need to be 
>>>>>>> DIP 
>>>>>>> or PLCC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have spent many hours looking at the schematics and designs of 
>>>>>>> others, I'm grasping the basics but one frustration and evident gap in 
>>>>>>> my 
>>>>>>> knowledge is how to pick / calculate the correct component and its size 
>>>>>>> or 
>>>>>>> rating for anything other than the most basic circuit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For example, with a 180v supply, calculating the anode resistor for 
>>>>>>> a tube based on the datasheet is straight forward enough as the 
>>>>>>> maintaining 
>>>>>>> voltage and current are known.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When looking at something like the HV5812, many seem to use a 60 or 
>>>>>>> 70V zener diode with a resistor to keep below the max for the chip but 
>>>>>>> how 
>>>>>>> do you determine the current needed for the driver, diode and load to 
>>>>>>> be 
>>>>>>> able to calculate the current limiting resistor? The diode datasheet is 
>>>>>>> simple enough but I'm lost with the sheet for the HV5812.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/8cbd5ac9-ea51-4294-9256-cb45b75ec8e0n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to