maybe splitting into core and apps would be nice, too? "Core" being the backend stuff like storage/DMS, file indexer, query service and the libraries, "apps" the rest
On 07/03/2011 11:51 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote: > Hey, > > On 07/03/2011 11:41 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: >> And what are the policies/guidlines of adding a project to this page ? >> > > Good question - this should be stated on the page. IMHO every > development activity (at the high level) should be reflected in the status. > > If there will be too many entries, it can be split into categories > (GSOC, refactoring, bugfixing etc.) but I think the more information the > better. > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Paweł Paprota<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> On 07/03/2011 10:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: >>>> Just a quick "yes, please" from me. I think this is a very good idea and >>>> I would gladly track my tasks on such a page, link other information to >>>> it and blog about it. >>>> >>> >>> Good to hear! >>> >>>> Would you take the task of finishing this page? Maybe add a big fat >>>> Nepomuk logo on top? ;) >>>> >>> >>> Sure. The problem is that I don't actually know what tasks are being >>> worked on currently! This was in fact the main reason for starting the >>> tracking page. >>> >>> Moreover, the core of this idea is that the tracking will be done >>> collectively so nothing's stopping anyone from updating the status. >>> >>> I still have a few ideas on how to improve the shape and form of the >>> page itself but obviously further suggestions are welcome. >>> >>> So basically to answer your question once again - yes and what else >>> would you like to see there? >>> >>> Paweł >>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> On 07/03/2011 09:34 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> as I'm about to start another development task in the Nepomuk project, >>>>> an idea came to my mind. I already said random things on IRC about using >>>>> Bugzilla for tracking development but I've decided to give this idea a >>>>> proper shape. >>>>> >>>>> So here is the first iteration: >>>>> >>>>> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/DevelopmentStatus >>>>> >>>>> There is enough introductory information on the page that I think >>>>> there's no need to duplicate the explanation of the idea in this e-mail. >>>>> >>>>> Let me know what you think and if it would be feasible to try to >>>>> maintain this page and see how it works (or doesn't work). >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nepomuk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nepomuk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
