well, I did not really know the difference between the two. I always assumed that techbase was for technical things while community was for end user stuff. If it is the other way around IMHO the site names are badly chosen. :P
It community is the right choice - fine, let's go there. I do not care at all. Cheers, Sebastian On 07/04/2011 11:23 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: > And, by the way, why techbase.kde.org <http://techbase.kde.org> ? Why > not community.kde.org <http://community.kde.org> ? > http://techbase.kde.org/Projects states that info for external users > should go to techbase, for internal - to community.kde.org > <http://community.kde.org>. > Not that I am against techbase - I just want raise and solve this > question before I start filling my pages. Not a big fan of moving pages > from one wiki to another :) > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Artem Serebriyskiy > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Vishesh Handa <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hey Everyone > > I think tracking development is a great idea, and using a wiki > is a lot better than bugzilla. But, still, a wiki? Editing a > wiki is a somewhat laborious task. Plus, it doesn't even look > that good. Then again, that will hopefully be improved. Does > anyone know of any better tools to track development? I'm hoping > for something that is a bit more machine readable. > > I don't [know], but may be there is a way to add such a page to > projects.kde.org <http://projects.kde.org> instead of wiki? It > already tracks commits, project descriptions and so on. May be it > can provide us with some 'metaproject' page for Nepomuk where we can > propogate statuses from usual nepomuk projects pages? > > But, again, I have no idea what can Redmine do and what can't. So > this weak idea needs more exploration. > > > Anyway, lets go on with the wiki page for now. It's better than > nothing. > > I'll add what all I'm working on over there. > Maybe even clean up the pages. > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Sebastian Trüg <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > maybe splitting into core and apps would be nice, too? > "Core" being the > backend stuff like storage/DMS, file indexer, query service > and the > libraries, "apps" the rest > > > Yes. That's a great idea. > > > > On 07/03/2011 11:51 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On 07/03/2011 11:41 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: > >> And what are the policies/guidlines of adding a project > to this page ? > >> > > > > Good question - this should be stated on the page. IMHO every > > development activity (at the high level) should be > reflected in the status. > > > > If there will be too many entries, it can be split into > categories > > (GSOC, refactoring, bugfixing etc.) but I think the more > information the > > better. > > > >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Paweł > Paprota<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >>> Hey, > >>> > >>> On 07/03/2011 10:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > >>>> Just a quick "yes, please" from me. I think this is a > very good idea and > >>>> I would gladly track my tasks on such a page, link > other information to > >>>> it and blog about it. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Good to hear! > >>> > >>>> Would you take the task of finishing this page? Maybe > add a big fat > >>>> Nepomuk logo on top? ;) > >>>> > >>> > >>> Sure. The problem is that I don't actually know what > tasks are being > >>> worked on currently! This was in fact the main reason > for starting the > >>> tracking page. > >>> > >>> Moreover, the core of this idea is that the tracking > will be done > >>> collectively so nothing's stopping anyone from updating > the status. > >>> > >>> I still have a few ideas on how to improve the shape and > form of the > >>> page itself but obviously further suggestions are welcome. > >>> > >>> So basically to answer your question once again - yes > and what else > >>> would you like to see there? > >>> > >>> Paweł > >>> > >>>> Cheers > >>>> Sebastian > >>>> > >>>> On 07/03/2011 09:34 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote: > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> as I'm about to start another development task in the > Nepomuk project, > >>>>> an idea came to my mind. I already said random things > on IRC about using > >>>>> Bugzilla for tracking development but I've decided to > give this idea a > >>>>> proper shape. > >>>>> > >>>>> So here is the first iteration: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/DevelopmentStatus > >>>>> > >>>>> There is enough introductory information on the page > that I think > >>>>> there's no need to duplicate the explanation of the > idea in this e-mail. > >>>>> > >>>>> Let me know what you think and if it would be feasible > to try to > >>>>> maintain this page and see how it works (or doesn't work). > >>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Nepomuk mailing list > >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Nepomuk mailing list > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Nepomuk mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Nepomuk mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > > > > > -- > Vishesh Handa > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Artem Serebriyskiy > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Artem Serebriyskiy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
