Hello, On 07/04/2011 11:23 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: > And, by the way, why techbase.kde.org ? Why not community.kde.org ? > http://techbase.kde.org/Projects states that info for external users should > go to techbase, for internal - to community.kde.org. > Not that I am against techbase - I just want raise and solve this question > before I start filling my pages. Not a big fan of moving pages from one wiki > to another :) >
I think you're right. But then again it is a bigger problem than just the development status page - many of the existing Nepomuk pages would have to be moved to community.kde.org to comply with the techbase vs community vision. > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Artem Serebriyskiy > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Vishesh Handa<[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hey Everyone >>> >>> I think tracking development is a great idea, and using a wiki is a lot >>> better than bugzilla. But, still, a wiki? Editing a wiki is a somewhat >>> laborious task. Plus, it doesn't even look that good. Then again, that will >>> hopefully be improved. Does anyone know of any better tools to track >>> development? I'm hoping for something that is a bit more machine readable. >>> >> I don't [know], but may be there is a way to add such a page to >> projects.kde.org instead of wiki? It already tracks commits, project >> descriptions and so on. May be it can provide us with some 'metaproject' >> page for Nepomuk where we can propogate statuses from usual nepomuk projects >> pages? >> >> But, again, I have no idea what can Redmine do and what can't. So this weak >> idea needs more exploration. >> >>> >>> Anyway, lets go on with the wiki page for now. It's better than nothing. >>> >>> I'll add what all I'm working on over there. >>> Maybe even clean up the pages. >>> >>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Sebastian Trüg<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> maybe splitting into core and apps would be nice, too? "Core" being the >>>> backend stuff like storage/DMS, file indexer, query service and the >>>> libraries, "apps" the rest >>>> >>> >>> Yes. That's a great idea. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 07/03/2011 11:51 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote: >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> On 07/03/2011 11:41 AM, Artem Serebriyskiy wrote: >>>>>> And what are the policies/guidlines of adding a project to this page ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Good question - this should be stated on the page. IMHO every >>>>> development activity (at the high level) should be reflected in the >>>> status. >>>>> >>>>> If there will be too many entries, it can be split into categories >>>>> (GSOC, refactoring, bugfixing etc.) but I think the more information >>>> the >>>>> better. >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Paweł Paprota<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 07/03/2011 10:58 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: >>>>>>>> Just a quick "yes, please" from me. I think this is a very good idea >>>> and >>>>>>>> I would gladly track my tasks on such a page, link other information >>>> to >>>>>>>> it and blog about it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good to hear! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you take the task of finishing this page? Maybe add a big fat >>>>>>>> Nepomuk logo on top? ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure. The problem is that I don't actually know what tasks are being >>>>>>> worked on currently! This was in fact the main reason for starting >>>> the >>>>>>> tracking page. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Moreover, the core of this idea is that the tracking will be done >>>>>>> collectively so nothing's stopping anyone from updating the status. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I still have a few ideas on how to improve the shape and form of the >>>>>>> page itself but obviously further suggestions are welcome. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So basically to answer your question once again - yes and what else >>>>>>> would you like to see there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paweł >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 07/03/2011 09:34 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> as I'm about to start another development task in the Nepomuk >>>> project, >>>>>>>>> an idea came to my mind. I already said random things on IRC about >>>> using >>>>>>>>> Bugzilla for tracking development but I've decided to give this >>>> idea a >>>>>>>>> proper shape. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So here is the first iteration: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/DevelopmentStatus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There is enough introductory information on the page that I think >>>>>>>>> there's no need to duplicate the explanation of the idea in this >>>> e-mail. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think and if it would be feasible to try to >>>>>>>>> maintain this page and see how it works (or doesn't work). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nepomuk mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Vishesh Handa >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nepomuk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sincerely yours, >> Artem Serebriyskiy >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nepomuk mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk _______________________________________________ Nepomuk mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
