On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:58:46 -0500, Chris Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This issue had been discussed to death on the list. If you'll read the > archives from last month, you see that Renaud has already addressed all your > concerns. > > I will say that following your logic, any program that links to Gnu Libc > would have to be GPL'ed as well. It is generally accepted that using shared > libraries does not constitute creating a derivative work of those libraries. >
GLIBC is LGPL not GPL, big difference. marc _______________________________________________ Nessus mailing list [email protected] http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
