On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:35:01 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> RFC 9113 HTTP/2 mandates certain validation for HTTP headers; the HttpClient 
>> don't fully implement the described requirements.
>> 
>> This PR adds the following validation:
>> - pseudo-headers defined for requests are rejected in responses and push 
>> streams
>> - pseudo-headers defined for responses are rejected in push promises
>> - connection headers are rejected in responses and push streams
>> 
>> Connection headers are still accepted in push promises; that's because some 
>> popular server implementations were found to echo the request headers in 
>> push promises, and when the original request was a HTTP/1 upgrade, the push 
>> promise could contain one or more headers that were prohibited in HTTP/2 but 
>> allowed in HTTP/1.
>> 
>> An existing test was adapted to verify the handling of response headers. The 
>> modified test passes with this the changes in this PR, fails without them. 
>> Other tier1-3 tests continue to pass.
>
> Daniel Jeliński has updated the pull request incrementally with two 
> additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Fix whitespace
>  - Use ProtocolException for malformed headers

test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/BadHeadersTest.java line 30:

> 28:  * @build jdk.httpclient.test.lib.http2.Http2TestServer 
> jdk.test.lib.net.SimpleSSLContext
> 29:  * @run testng/othervm -Djdk.internal.httpclient.debug=true BadHeadersTest
> 30:  * @summary This test verifies the behaviour of the HttpClient when 
> presented

Nit - the jtreg tag ordering guideline recommends adding `@summary` after the 
`@bug` line https://openjdk.org/jtreg/tag-spec.html#ORDER.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24569#discussion_r2063795188

Reply via email to