On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:35:01 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> RFC 9113 HTTP/2 mandates certain validation for HTTP headers; the HttpClient >> don't fully implement the described requirements. >> >> This PR adds the following validation: >> - pseudo-headers defined for requests are rejected in responses and push >> streams >> - pseudo-headers defined for responses are rejected in push promises >> - connection headers are rejected in responses and push streams >> >> Connection headers are still accepted in push promises; that's because some >> popular server implementations were found to echo the request headers in >> push promises, and when the original request was a HTTP/1 upgrade, the push >> promise could contain one or more headers that were prohibited in HTTP/2 but >> allowed in HTTP/1. >> >> An existing test was adapted to verify the handling of response headers. The >> modified test passes with this the changes in this PR, fails without them. >> Other tier1-3 tests continue to pass. > > Daniel Jeliński has updated the pull request incrementally with two > additional commits since the last revision: > > - Fix whitespace > - Use ProtocolException for malformed headers test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/http2/BadHeadersTest.java line 30: > 28: * @build jdk.httpclient.test.lib.http2.Http2TestServer > jdk.test.lib.net.SimpleSSLContext > 29: * @run testng/othervm -Djdk.internal.httpclient.debug=true BadHeadersTest > 30: * @summary This test verifies the behaviour of the HttpClient when > presented Nit - the jtreg tag ordering guideline recommends adding `@summary` after the `@bug` line https://openjdk.org/jtreg/tag-spec.html#ORDER. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24569#discussion_r2063795188