DS> I've just applied a patch to the main development code which should DS> help with this situation (appended). Try that and see if it helps.
RS> If it works, it should probably be applied to the 5.1 and 5.0 RS> patches branches as well. I'm getting forgetful in my old age - it appears that I *did* apply it to the 5.1 branch at the same time. I've now added it to the 5.0 line as well. But that's also reminded me of another question I was going to raise. The libwrap calls check against "snmpd" if there's an address string, but "snmp" it there isn't. Is this difference intentional? If so, why? Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
